After removing the title graphic from my website should a drop in Google position be expected?
The title graphic in question was only small (64x64) but was in the top-left corner of every single page on the website (about 500 pages).
It didn't drop immediately - about 3-4 months after I made the change.
I removed the title graphic because I found in the Google documentation that using graphics that are not "unique" means that the site is classed as low quality.
I did pay for the graphic - but it's just not "unique".
Thanks.
ADDENDUM
My site went from the bottom of page two (where it's been for years) to now being at position 55-60...!
Addendum 2:
This is here in response to Mikes answer: The bits in QRG that I identified as referring to using stock images making a site low quality are these bits (from April(ish) 2023:
4.6.4 Any type of content may be copied: text, images, video, etc. Images may be slightly cropped or edited to avoid detection. People may alter videos as well, or even make a video of a screen playing video! Copied content with no value added is Lowest quality.
4.6.4 Content that is copied, but changed slightly from the original. This type of copying makes it difficult to find the exact matching original source. Sometimes just a few words are changed, or whole sentences are changed, or a "find and replace" modification is made, where one word is replaced with another throughout the text. Images may be cropped or videos may be segmented into shorter clips. These types of changes are deliberately done to make it difficult to find the original source of the content. We call this kind of content copied with minimal alteration.
5.2 Using images from other sources (magazines, stock image websites, etc.) to avoid having to create pictures or diagrams to support the material in the report.
I also remember (years ago now) that John Mu once said "Improve the quality of your site" to me in the webmasters help forum.
PS Glad you like the software!