Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with meta-tags
Search options not deleted
user 46604
Meta tags convey information about a webpage, such as its description or its keywords, in a way that a computer program can understand. They can be specified with the <meta> element and its 'name' and 'content' attributes.
4
votes
1
answer
249
views
Are there only 12 directives for <meta name="robots" />?
As far as I can tell, in 2017, the <meta name="robots" content="index, follow"> accepts the following directives in the content attribute:
index
follow
all (equivalent to content="index, follow")
…
- 2,365
3
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Can the content attribute of <meta name="robots" /> be left empty?
Is
<meta name="robots" content="" />
a legitimate meta, exactly equivalent to:
<meta name="robots" content="index, follow" />
<meta name="robots" content="all" />
[nothing]
Or must the conten …
- 2,365
16
votes
Accepted
Twitter card [summary_large_image] not displaying image
2020 Update from @MattGreer:
It seems like now the image needs to be 1200x630, and not 2:1 anymore.
Once I used that size, my image started showing up. See @johanv's
answer.
Original answer from 20 …
- 2,365
24
votes
8
answers
35k
views
Twitter card [summary_large_image] not displaying image
I have set up a series of Twitter cards for my website.
The type of twitter card is [summary_large_image].
The meta-information included in the <head> of my webpage is:
<meta name="twitter:card" co …
- 2,365
3
votes
Accepted
Is it legitimate for rel prev / next links to indicate a circular sequence of pages?
Three and a half months later I have come back to this with an entirely satisfactory solution.
I was unaware of this when I posted the question above in March 2020, but way back in 2011, the W3C inclu …
- 2,365
3
votes
1
answer
93
views
Is it legitimate for rel prev / next links to indicate a circular sequence of pages?
Before anything else, yes, Google no longer takes note of rel prev / next and has not done so (officially) for nearly a year. Google officially deprecated rel prev / next as a crawl / indexing factor …
- 2,365