45

What do double slashes often found in URLs mean?

For example:

  • http://www.example.com/A/B//C/

Please note: I'm not referring to the beginning right after http:.

4 Answers 4

44

As mentioned by @RandomBen, the double slash is most likely the result of an error somewhere.

That the page loads has nothing to do with the browser, but rather that the server ignores the extra slash. The browser doesn't do anything special with extra slashes in the URL, it just sends them along in the request:

GET /A/B//C/D HTTP/1.1
Host: www.example.com
...

It looks like current versions of Apache and IIS both will ignore the extra slashes while resolving the path and return the document that would have been returned had the URL not had extra slashes. However, browsers (I tested IE 8 and Chrome 9) get confused by any relative URLs (containing parent path components) of resources in the page, which produces bad results. For example, if a page has:

<link rel="stylesheet" href="../../style.css" type="text/css" />

Upon loading the page /a/b/c/, the browser will request /a/style.css. But if—for whatever reason—/a/b//c/ is requested (and the server ignores the extra slash), the browser will end up requesting /a/b/style.css, which won't exist. Oops, the page looks ugly.

(This obviously won't happen if the URL doesn't have a parent path component (..) or is absolute.)

It is my opinion that Apache and IIS (and probably others) are acting incorrectly as /a/b/c/ and /a/b//c/ technically represent two different resources. According to RFC 2396, every slash is significant:

  path          = [ abs_path | opaque_part ]

  path_segments = segment *( "/" segment )
  segment       = *pchar *( ";" param )
  param         = *pchar

  pchar         = unreserved | escaped |
                  ":" | "@" | "&" | "=" | "+" | "$" | ","

So, /a/b/c/ consists of three segments: "a", "b", and "c"; /a/b//c/ actually consists of four: "a", "b", "" (the empty string), and "c". Whether or not the empty string is a valid filesystem directory is a detail of the server's platform. (And logically, this means the browsers are actually operating correctly when parsing relative URLs with parent path components – in my example, they go up past the "c" directory and the "" directory, leaving us to request style.css from "b".)

If you're using Apache with mod_rewrite, there is a pretty simple fix:

# remove multiple slashes anywhere in url 
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^(.*)//(.*)$ 
RewriteRule . %1/%2 [R=301,L] 

This will issue a HTTP 301 Moved Permanently redirect so that any double slashes are stripped out of the URL.

11
  • 2
    Wouldn't it be better to have your mod_rewrite solution take into account 3, 4, ... slashes too? Something along the lines of /{2,}? (Assuming Apache allows that kind of quantifier, I'm not too familiar with it) Commented Jan 28, 2011 at 0:16
  • +1 - Thanks for the extra info. I didn't think of it that way! Commented Jan 28, 2011 at 11:18
  • 3
    It's not incorrect behavior: a/b and a//b indeed are two distinct URL paths, but nothing forbids the server from returning the same resource for both of them if it wants. I do agree with you, however, that in practice returning a 301 redirect would seem more useful. Commented Apr 9, 2012 at 19:44
  • 4
    @IlmariKaronen: It absolutely is incorrect behavior because (1) this behavior automatically creates an infinite number of potential duplicate references to a single resource (which, if not in violation of the letter of any spec, certainly violates the spirit), and more practically (2) it "breaks" relative-path handling in browsers that do properly count the empty string in a//b as a directory (see the stylesheet example above).
    – josh3736
    Commented Apr 9, 2012 at 20:14
  • 2
    ...and anyway, I'd argue that RFC 2396 does forbid a server from returning the same resource by auto-collapsing slashes because the spec says every slash is significant. Automatically ignoring consecutive slashes is in violation of that spec. (It's one thing if someone programmed their server to do that, even if doing so would be silly. However, servers doing this by default is incorrect.)
    – josh3736
    Commented Apr 9, 2012 at 20:21
37

That is an error in the programmers'/developers' code. If you compare these two URLS:

  • http://www.example.com/A/B/C/
  • http://www.example.com/A/B//C/

They look different but if you were to visit either, both of them would work in most modern browsers.

This is something you want to fix. If you have the double slash it could confuse Google's web crawlers and make them think there is 2 versions of the page.

1
  • 15
    Actually, that the page loads has nothing to do with the browser, but rather that the server ignores the extra slash. This got long, so see the answer I posted.
    – josh3736
    Commented Jan 27, 2011 at 21:29
6

The double slash has a meaning when it's used in resource URLs. For example, when it's used in CSS for the URL of a background image:

.classname {
    background : url("//example.com/a/b/c/d.png");
}

Here it means this background image is fetching from a different domain other than the domain of the present web page. Or in other words, http:// can be written as just // when using that in resource URLs.

But this double slash in between the URLs (e.g.: /a//b/c/d.htm) doesn't have any meaning.

1
  • 2
    well, this is not whole truth. The double slash is ised when one needs to avoid mixed content problem, thus when the site is loaded from http the doubleslash will expand to http, when the site is loaded from https the doubleslash is expanded to https.
    – andrej
    Commented May 14, 2016 at 17:33
2

As mentioned, some servers are setup to ignore a double slash in the URL path, but Amazon S3 static hosting will not. If you want to handle/ignore them in that case, you can use Redirection Rules in the properties panel.

If you want to ignore a double slash following the domain name then you could use something like this:

<RoutingRules>
  <RoutingRule>
    <Condition>
      <KeyPrefixEquals>/</KeyPrefixEquals>
    </Condition>
    <Redirect>
      <ReplaceKeyPrefixWith/>
    </Redirect>
  </RoutingRule>
</RoutingRules>

You can probably also find and replace them throughout, but that was enough for me.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.