Timeline for Dropping adverts during responsive design changes
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 13, 2012 at 16:51 | vote | accept | Toby | ||
S Jan 13, 2012 at 13:04 | history | suggested | Zhaph - Ben Duguid | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed some typos, made the question title slightly better
|
Jan 13, 2012 at 12:42 | answer | added | Zhaph - Ben Duguid | timeline score: 3 | |
Jan 13, 2012 at 12:24 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jan 13, 2012 at 13:04 | |||||
Jan 13, 2012 at 11:27 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/157785721065836544 | ||
Jan 13, 2012 at 8:31 | comment | added | Toby | @Dan - I don't follow - what I am saying is removing ad space as part of responsive design. | |
Jan 13, 2012 at 4:43 | comment | added | Dan | Well, because the next step up is almost 50% ad space, I'd say they get their money's worth! | |
Jan 12, 2012 at 23:01 | comment | added | Toby | Well lets say I charge someone £100 for advertising on my site, do I need to put on a disclaimer to say you are really only buying adverts on pages that are viewed over a certain size. | |
Jan 12, 2012 at 22:56 | comment | added | Osvaldo | When ads are priced per click in an (online) auction, size practically doesn't matter. The market will decide it's value balancing offer and demand. I'm afraid your question(s) is not very clear to me. What would be a correct answer? | |
Jan 12, 2012 at 22:23 | history | asked | Toby | CC BY-SA 3.0 |