100
There are many acceptable ways to structure your site for both SEO and internationalization. Each have advantages and disadvantages.
Top Level Domains
Buy the same domain name at multiple top level country domains like example.com, example.es and example.de.
Advantages
Fully supported by Google. You can add the sites to Google Webmaster Tools where ...
20
If you canonicalise appropriately, it is fine. Use rel="canonical" to specify that the pages are identical, and hreflang for the alternate languages.
<link rel="canonical" href="https://example.org/es/ads/2">
<link rel="alternate" hreflang="en" href="https://example.org/en/ads/2">
<link rel="alternate" hreflang="es" href="https://example.org/...
13
It is more user friendly to translate slugs, but don't expect, it will bump your site's ranking like a bomb.
Google is able to translate URLs by itself, so it can match a meaning of a page with english URL and italian content.
URL translation could lightly improve your user metrics and user experience, which are ranking factors too.
Also, if you do it, do ...
10
With the rel=canonical across languages (eg, de -> canonical -> en), you're saying that these pages are equivalent and that you have a preference regarding which URL to index. If that's the case, if you think the translated boilerplate doesn't add more value (which might be the case), then that (I'd call it "canonical language") seems like a good setup.
If,...
9
The Googlebot can submit forms, but it generally doesn't unless it can detect a reason to do so.
So from the links, if your translations were AJAX'd and built properly, Googlebot may very well submit the form to see what the results would be. However, this behavior (especially on POST), is not guaranteed and you should probably use GET to make things more ...
7
Yes! In a recent blog post we mentioned:
Your [rel-alternate-hreflang] annotations should be self-referential. Page A should use rel-alternate-hreflang annotation linking to itself.
6
Here's Google's own tips for multilingual sites. In summary:
Make sure the page language is obvious by sticking to one language per page.
Keep the content for different languages on separate URLs. Don’t use cookies to show translated versions of the page. Consider cross-linking each language version of a page.
Tell Google if your site is targeting a ...
6
The problem with your set-up (from an SEO standpoint) is that search engines don't accept cookies, so whenever a bot follows a link to your root domain, it'll be sent to your English content. Hopefully, there's an abundance of links to the other language content, too, but in my experience, this situation nevertheless seems to lie at the root of a lot of ...
6
Canonical tags are no longer needed in the mark up for multilingual sites, you can see here where Google no longer recommends using canonicals in multilingual markup (the struck out section):
new markup for multilingual content (old blog post)
So this just leaves you with two options, use either rel="alternate" hreflang="x" tags or use the rel="alternate" ...
6
The typical format for a locale is comprised of the two letter language code followed by the two letter country code. For example, here is a list of all the locales supported by Java:
Language Country Locale ID
--------------------------------------------------------------
Albanian Albania ...
answered May 12 '14 at 15:29
6
Splash screens are acceptable according to Google. They do offer some best practices however, when using multi-language/multi-regional sites.
In this article, Google recommends the use of the hreflang tag within <link rel="alternate" ... /> tag in the head. The specific excerpt from the article is below:
For language/country selectors or ...
6
It is a confusing state of affairs, but here are some pointers:
Don't use the canonical tag in the way you were thinking. Content translated into several languages is not duplicate content. So you don't want to be pointing /fr/ --canonical--> /en/ at all. Use rel="alternate" hreflang="en" instead. Use canonical within a given language to account for ...
5
Definitely keep the <link> tags in your <head> section. I've never read anywhere that Google actually acknowledges rel="alternate" on <a> tags. Also many other bots may only retrieve the <head> of your documents, so if those <link> tags aren't in the header, they may never actually see them. But I don't think that having the rel=...
5
You should use the lang attribute (e.g., on the html element) to declare the language, not a meta tag.
This allows you to overwrite the language declaration for other parts on the page (note the lang attributes in my example markup for a language switcher).
Anyway, having a few words in a different language shouldn’t affect your SEO at all, whether you use ...
5
Many multi-lingual sites don’t have the language tag for the default/primary language in the URL¹, but I think it’s better to include it. So yes, in my opinion, it’s not only good design, it’s the best.
Its suggesting itself to use the root page as a site/language chooser. I think there are three ways how this page can work:
Redirect (based on certain ...
4
As of Jun 10, 2014 Google recommends either ccTLDs, Subdomains with gTLDs or Sub-directories with gTLDs. URL parameters such as ?lang=en are not recommended:
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/182192?hl=en#2
(Funny that the page which says that it's not recommended to use URL parameters for this, is actually doing exactly this.)
4
I believe the problem might be due to auto redirecting the root url ('/') or automatically setting the language, should I exclude robots somehow?
Correct. Googlebot et al don't send an Accept-Language header, or accept cookies, so it'll see whatever the site defaults to without it, which would appear to be English in this case. You can verify this using ...
4
It's my understanding that we at Google don't use any of the language meta-information within PDF files. You can, however, use the hreflang information via HTTP header or Sitemaps file for non-HTML content too.
4
Bing absolutely does. Before I told it not to it would continually submit both a contact form and a survey form. I knew it was Bingbot because I included $_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'] in the $_POST information. No other spider ever submitted those forms.
4
This is the language which dominates because there are many countries which use the same language. That's why, you need to specify to language first and then precise with the country.
Thus, the most appropriate is http://www.example.com/en-in/.
However, there is no impact on SEO, it's just a standard.
For this kind of stuff, you can just take a look how ...
4
Ok. Found the answer at:
Help Google serve the correct language to your visitors
We need to have a url tag for each of the url and specify the others as alternate urls.
3
They can and do. I've got a simple email collection form on the front of a site I'm about ready to launch. I just received a submission from that form from IP 66.249.73.214, which is a GoogleBot IP.
3
If you don't have a specific locale, you can just specify the language. Google give an example here: rel="alternate" hreflang="x"
If you have several alternate URLs targeted at users with the same
language but in different locales, it's a good idea to provide a
generic URL for geographically unspecified users. For example, you may
have specific ...
3
You need to include the "/" URL in your Sitemap file and specify it as the hreflang "x-default". That way, Google will know that this is a part of your set of pages, and will be able to handle it appropriately. Note that hreflang is a signal, and not a directive for Google, so it might be that the "/" URL still occasionally shows up.
3
The hreflang tags are on all these URLs yet Google hasn't pick up the global site
Assuming that you're intending the last link to be the "global site", since you indicated that to be default page with hreflang="x-default", which doesn't target any specific language or locale, then it's not necessary to specify the canonical link on each language specific ...
3
I think that what you'll want to do is change the way your system works. If no language is specified in the URL, but you detect the language via the browser settings, then your site should redirect the user to a URL with that language in the path. This is for two reason:
1) Duplicate content. Spiders/Bots will come to test.com/books, test.com/booken, and ...
3
In each language-specific page, ensure you have the language set. Either use the <meta http-equiv="content-language" content="ll-cc"> tag in the section of your page, where "ll-cc" stands for the culture code of the language and country/region the content applies to, or use the lang="ll-cc" attribute on either the <html> or the <title> tag ...
3
For users either a 302 or 307 redirect is fine. The only practical difference between those and a 301 redirect is caching. Browsers cache a 301 redirect. If the user changes their browser language settings, it would be better if they were able to visit the root page and redirect differently. So using a non-cachable 302 or 307 redirect is appropriate.
...
answered May 25 '19 at 10:50
3
The URLs should be in the same language as the content. Ideally you would also translate the relevant path segments (like "product" in your example), not only the slug.
A URL that’s in a language users might not understand is useless for them. A good URL is descriptive, it gives an idea what the content is about. If it’s in a language the users don’t ...
Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible
