Is it a problem to put a schemaless URL in a canonical tag?
Example: page URL is
http://example.com while canonical tag is
<link rel="canonical" href="//example.com" />.
Webmasters Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for pro webmasters. It only takes a minute to sign up.Sign up to join this community
It’s technically allowed:
RFC 6596 allows relative URLs:
Specify a relative IRI (see [RFC3986], Section 4.2).
RFC 3986 defines that a protocol-relative URL is some kind of relative reference:
A relative reference that begins with two slash characters is termed a network-path reference […]
It can become a problem if the document is accessible from more than one scheme/protocol. So if you have a HTTP and a HTTPS version (and you don’t redirect one to the other), you end up with two different
canonical URLs, which defeats the purpose of using
Also note that you don’t necessarily have control over the protocols. For example, if someone downloads your document (that contains a protocol-relative
canonical URL) and uses it locally (
file: scheme), the
canonical URL wouldn’t point to your HTTP/HTTPS URL.