Can I say "Schema.org is a kind of markup ontology language"?

closed as too broad by dan Jun 7 '16 at 2:12

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


I like this question! We do not get theoretical or philosophical questions here. So you are making us think. STOP IT!!

In respect that it manages data through some form of mark-up such as with an ontology typically being XML, RDF, etc., you may have something. However, it is not a database (of sorts) that covers a topic. For example, a dictionary, thesaurus, fact links, etc. In that respect, No. An ontology is used to reference and understand a subject area, while schema.org mark-up is a way of communicating a sub-set of data and not the whole data set.

Similar. But different.

You are on the right track though. In it's similarity, it is trusted and used by search engines to parse data and not parse text. In this way, you really are passing data directly to search engines as opposed to content that needs to be understood.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.