1

For example

 <div itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/ExerciseAction">
        <meta itemprop="additionalType" content="http://www.productontology.org/id/Long-distance_running">
    </div>

If so, which vocabulary(?) is more descriptive?

productontology.org dbpedia.org wikipedia.org ?

  • Note that you must use link instead of meta because the value is a URI: <link itemprop="additionalType" href="http://www.productontology.org/id/Long-distance_running" > – unor Dec 30 '15 at 13:20
2

Follow as in visit? Probably not.

In additionalType you specify a URI that represents a type.

  • If a search engine supports this type, it has no need to visit it (because it already knows what it needs to know when seeing the URI).
  • If a search engine doesn’t support this type, it could visit its URI, learn something about it (via RDF), and make use of it, but as far as I know there is no general Web search engine that does this (specialized Linked Data / Semantic Web consumers do this).

You shouldn’t use an URI just because its page represents what you want to convey. Instead you should use URIs from vocabularies, which provide RDF to specify that they are meant to be used as classes and ideally describe the meaning.

So the Product Types Ontology and DBpedia are suitable candidates (and there are many more), but Wikipedia isn’t one. Which one to use can’t be answered in general. It always depends on your content and the consumers you expect to make use of it (i.e., what they support).

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.