I've tried setting up a uptime monitor on my CDN, to keep track of response times and to get notified if something were to happen to it. Problem is; my checks are filling the report logs with junk. There is nothing strange about that, the check is making a HEAD request to some URL and it gets logged.

But; this means that the cache hit value gets either very high or very low. And this value is a bit interesting on a CDN so would like to avoid that. A port monitor does not leave any trace in the logs.

So then comes my question:

Is a monitor for port 443 a (at least somewhat) good indicator that the web server is fine? Would it catch a 500 error?

  • Have you tried monitoring port 80, the standard port for HTTP? Sep 9, 2015 at 21:13
  • I have; but this server also shares secure assets. Which is why I am monitoring the HTTPS port. Sep 9, 2015 at 21:20

1 Answer 1


I put up a port check on 443, and a http test. And after 2.5 months of testing I can conclude that; no, it is not a good indicator.

During the 2.5 months of testing the port test has not failed once, while the http test has six incidents:

4 x 503
1 x 500
1 x Connection timeout

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.