We have a main website for a big company, let's say www.tartempion.com.

We bought about 60 domain names (let's say www.tartempion.org, www.tartempion.se but also www.strangename.net), mainly to avoid that domain squatters do it.

Is it a good idea to have 301 redirects for all those domains, or would it be better to have no content at all? Can I find some authoritative documentation on the subject?


If you bought all these domains to avoid cyber squatting, you can apply 301 redirects to the main website. It will indicate to visitors all domains belong to your company.

  • Thanks. Any reference document to help convince my coworkers that this won't ruin our rankings? – ymajoros Jul 4 '13 at 9:41
  • 1
    I don't have a reference document but you can read this. For me, it's just logical. Big companies like Microsoft... do it. – Zistoloen Jul 4 '13 at 9:58
  • Logical to me to, but not to everyone. Microsoft example is a good one to me, but what about unrelated domain names? – ymajoros Jul 4 '13 at 10:06
  • I agree that it is common practice. I've worked as an employee of several top websites that have hundreds of typo and alternate domain names that redirect to the main site. – Stephen Ostermiller Jul 4 '13 at 10:15
  • 1
    It's a little bit different but Google purchases many companies and for some of them, it redirects old domain name to google.com. Example for phonetics-arts.com. You can find some examples of companies which have a domain name redirected to Google on this Wikipedia page. – Zistoloen Jul 4 '13 at 12:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.