0

Possible Duplicate:
Good Practice for Formatting SEO-Friendly URLs?

I'm looking into seo-ing my urls and i was wording which of these link structures was better to use:

1) www.mydomain.com/contact-john-smith/index.html -or-

2) www.mydomain.com/contact-john-smith/contact.html -or-

3) www.mydomain.com/contact-john-smith.html

I realize they're all basically the same but i was wondering if any of those permutations had an advantage over the others.

0
4
www.mydomain.com/contact-john-smith

But if you have to use one of three choices then #3 is the closest match to my answer

2
  • Could you explain your reasoning, and why dropping the file name and extension is preferred – toomanyairmiles Feb 3 '12 at 21:02
  • 1
    Because .html is pretty meaningless. All web pages output HTML, and using the extension doesn't guarantee a static file on the server (it could still be generated with PHP etc). – DisgruntledGoat Feb 4 '12 at 11:58
0

I would go for option #3.

Please keep in mind that:

  • It's good to have keyword rich URLs (that helps with linkbuilding and is good for the understanding of the website structure);
  • It's important to keep pages you want to rank with close to the root.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.