People from stackoverflow have been working closely with google team to help them make the panda algorithm more efficient, so I guess they've learned a lot from the google team.

Thus they may have done very clever friendly URLs to maximize the page rank.

I've seen from time to time very long URLs (can't find where) in stackoverflow, but after a certain "amount" of character there were only numbers, kind of "ok passed this length, SEOs will ignore this so let's put only numbers".

I've done a huge work on my framework to make very friendly URLs, and my website can come up with URLs like:


It's very long and I'm wondering if the previous URL won't be mixed with, say, this one:

  • I try to keep my URl short and simple. I think if you want higher page rank you should focus on descriptive meta tags as well as your title pages. Also keywords play a major role as well.
    – Marcus Na
    Oct 10, 2014 at 5:26
  • having SEO friendly URL only not helps in site ranking in search results. URL must be within 100 characters is preferred for url limitation. Oct 11, 2014 at 10:55

2 Answers 2


Friendly for whom exactly? For visitors these urls aren't very friendly.

I'd advice you to keep it a lot shorter, around 6 keywords at the max.




  • If you look at my example URLs, there are mysite/(1)/(2)/(3)/(4)/(5)/(6)/(7)/ => only 7 keywords, instead of the 6 you adviced. Does this make a difference? Jan 5, 2012 at 10:21
  • No, if you leave words like 'de' etc out, I count these keywords in your first url: recherche region provence alpes cote azur departement bouches rhone categorie metiers paramedical. That's 12. Jan 5, 2012 at 10:56
  • Ok for SEOs, the separators are not "only" slashes (/) but - too? Jan 5, 2012 at 11:05
  • That's right, so it sees every word in your url as a keyword. That's good, because "provence-alpes-cote-d-azur" is not a word people will type in, but "cote d'azur" or "provence" is, so it's better that Google sees each as a separate word. It does mean though that you have a lot of keywords in your urls :) Jan 5, 2012 at 16:01

It's not the search engines' place to decide how long URLs should be; they just have to index them.
That said, extremely long URLs with lots of keywords and such might start getting you flagged as potentially suspicious. They don't come up(for me) as much anymore, but think back to when search results for certain things tended to be overwhelmed with matches from eg. ohiorefrigeratorrepairparts.com/kenmore/etc/etc...

On the whole, sure your URLs are "friendly" but they're also trying a bit too hard. You're making the mistake of thinking that your URL structure has to precisely match your site/content structure. Keeping URLs concise is another factor in friendliness. For more on that, see @Litso's response. Here's a Google Webmaster Help video with Matt Cutts saying a keyword's directory depth has basically no effect, for whatever that's also worth. But I also recall another video which I can't find right now, in which he said that after a certain number of directories deep, the spider stops paying attention. [I can't find this right now; if anyone else has a link(or can refute), feel free to edit.]

From a couple other angles...

The HTTP spec says there is no technical limit on length(section 3.2.1):

The HTTP protocol does not place any a priori limit on the length of a URI.

... and in pretty much any practical situation, the actual browsers will hold up to that unless you really, really force the issue. (Who cares if the search engines handle huge URLs, if the browsers don't.) That's research is ~5years old, but largely holds up.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.