I have an existing collection at https://cjshayward.com which is everything I've created, and intended to be unfiltered.

I want to set https://cshayward.com (no "J") to be a "The Good Parts" website.

An implementation question I am facing is which are live option(s):

  1. Linking from a https://cshayward.com page to e.g. https://cjshayward.com/letters/, and/or:
  2. Setting up a copy at https://cshayward.com/letters/ with a rel="canonical" link to https://cjshayward.com/letters/.

Is the second option in some way bad, or is making a copy with rel="canonical" "clean" as far as search engines are concerned?

  • What's the purpose of having a website that just has the good parts of some other website? Mar 21, 2022 at 1:02
  • One website is "everything but the kitchen sink"; the intended other site is just the best stuff so people will only find best works. Mar 22, 2022 at 10:13
  • Why not just make the good stuff on your website more prominent and hide the other stuff? Mar 22, 2022 at 10:17
  • I've already done something like that, but I want the complete works to be available, and not break incoming links, and have a way to point people to best works. The main site has multiple megabytes of text and a best works collection on Amazon at 700+ pages is still less than one tenth of the work. I want my whole works to be available, and have something I can point people to my best works without impairing full functioning of incoming links to the works they were linked to. There are dual first-class interests. Mar 22, 2022 at 13:45


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.