Lab data, as well as online analysis tools show my site to have 0 cumulative layout shift (CLS) issues in mobile and desktop versions. However, Google field data is showing 0.30 CLS issues, (Critical, no passing level!).

Is this to be expected and typical? I have no other ideas on how to fix this. I wonder how people can still experience CLS.... perhaps they are on older devices that don't respond to modern code, therefore having CLS issues?

  • Have you used Google Chrome's Lighthouse developer tools to test your site yourself with a variety of screen widths? The lab data from Pagespeed Insights only uses two widths: one for desktop and one for mobile. It is possible that there is some layout shift at another browser width. Jan 27, 2021 at 11:12
  • @StephenOstermiller, are you saying that Lighthouse tests CLS across all resolutions in a single step or that you can simply change the viewport and retest?
    – Trebor
    Feb 19, 2021 at 15:31
  • Using the Chrome developer tools you can change the viewport and rerun the lighthouse tests yourself. Feb 19, 2021 at 16:02

1 Answer 1


Is this to be expected and typical? In short, yes.

Google's extensive documentation on Core Web Vitals, and specifically on cumulative layout shift, are explicit on this point:

Caution: Lab tools typically load pages in a synthetic environment and are thus only able to measure layout shifts that occur during page load. As a result, CLS values reported by lab tools for a given page may be less than what real users experience in the field.

Source: https://web.dev/cls/

[…] while testing in the lab is a reasonable proxy for performance, it isn't necessarily reflective of how all users experience your site in the wild.

Source: https://web.dev/user-centric-performance-metrics/#in-the-field

Your "lab" measurements are useful up to a point, but the real measurement is the aggregated, real-world experiential data coming from CrUX (Chrome User Experience Report).

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.