I'm doing SEO for a new real estate company, yet the developer had surprised me with this:

The developer had created two websites with two domains for one brand:

The first domain/website:

samplehouse.com - that's where the rental and real estate listings go

The second domain/website:

samplehouseinc.com - that website has pages like "about us" "pricing" "contact us" "how it works" and basically only pages representing the brand.

When I asked the developer the reason behind two websites!! this was her response:

The website was too big to be put on one Domain. Hence the reason that we got two domains!!!!

If you can please answer some of my concerns:

  1. How does this affect SEO?
  2. How to notify Google about this?
  3. This will likely create confusion to some users, what do you think?
  4. Should the site be redone again using just one domain only? given the fact that the company is just starting out in a competitive niche.

Your answers are appreciated and thanks a lot in advance.

2 Answers 2


How does this affect SEO?

Foobars it.

How to notify Google about this?

You can't.

This will likely create confusion to some users, what do you think?


Should the site be redone again using just one domain only? given the fact that the company is just starting out in a competitive niche.



Your developer is not only wrong but nuts too! Make it one domain. There is no such thing as too big for a domain. Not only is he seriously confusing the companies brand, he is seriously confusing the companies customers. That is, if they come by. You are leaving huge potential on the table. How much? Who can say other than to say what you are doing now is catastrophic. Catastrophic enough to be too long to address on this Q&A format.

Here is my experience.

I am a landlord and have occasion to advertise a vacancy. This makes sense especially when you consider that affluence is decidedly separated by how people shop for a place to live. Many sites are owned by companies that are sometimes owned by another parent company. What was common amongst then was the listing site and company site were separate. If I were to go to the listing site, it becomes difficult to know who the company is and whether or not I trust them. Often, there is a sign up without pricing or much of a clue who I am dealing with. Even where this is clearer, it is not clear enough. So who did I chose? The one company that was open with who they are by having one site for all listings and company information. Even then, that is an up hill battle when I can simply put up a web site and be found in search far easier than the top brands who are not doing enough to brand their sites and diluted their efforts. One simple site out performs them all. Are you getting my point?

Real estate company sites are notoriously poor. In 3 months and $70 per month one site returned two scammer inquiries where my site returned several qualified candidates in just a few days. There are many reasons for this. Far too many to list here. But please take it from me, the comments of the developer is way off point if you want a site that performs well in search. Otherwise, the most you can do is mediocre.

Lets look at this logically.

You have examplelistingsite.com and examplecompany.com. The listing site has all the traffic and perhaps most of the links. The company site has all the branding signals. What is happening? The advantage of being an authority through content, traffic, SERP signals, etc., are not benefiting the company site and all of the brand signals of the company is not benefiting the listing site. You can attempt to brand the listing site, however, most of the signals that are required for a brand are what is termed RCS (real company sh_t) a term Google actually uses, are missing. What happens is that real advantages that all SEOs strive for are split between two sites and neither site can fully perform as it should unless combined. It is that simple.

  • I voted your answer up because you are absolutely right, but this is the classic example of why you should never let a pure-play developer do any form of SEO. The solution the developer came up with is logical (sort of) from an engineering standpoint, but really, really silly in other areas.
    – Sandy Lee
    Commented Mar 22, 2018 at 13:58
  • Thank you very much. I appreciate it a lot. You're indeed right and I did a thorough search and came to the same conclusions. The company is looking to hire a new developer and see how we can transform things around. Thanks again for sharing :)
    – pro946
    Commented Mar 22, 2018 at 14:44

This is not a good situation. The 2 domain names are too similar and will result in visitor confusion. And yes, your SEO will be a mess, as will your branding. No one (and no search engines) will clearly understand which is which. Pick one domain and use that. In my opinion, find a new developer and create a new website. (Using a very similar domain name has been used as a competition scheme to pull traffic and search results/SEO gains away from companies, why hurt yourself.)

  • Thanks a lot for your answer. Yes, you're right and your answers are very helpful. We're looking to find a new developer and hopefully place all content on one domain only. Thank you
    – pro946
    Commented Mar 22, 2018 at 14:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.