7

I've got the canonical:

<link href="http://www.Site.com/Blog/how-to-know-when-this" rel="canonical" />

Is it ok if this is on the page it is pointing to?

Also I'm putting it on all these pages:

http://www.Site.com/Blog/how-to-know-when-this
http://www.Site.com/Blog/how-to-know-when-this/
http://www.Site.com/Blog.aspx?ID=1
http://www.Site.com/Blog/how-to-know-when-this/?q=

Is this correct useage?

1

2 Answers 2

4

That's perfectly fine to do. It's just redundant and doesn't do any harm.

3
  • 1
    I do it all the time because it makes programming easier when you have multiple pages with the same code and it helps me remember which page is the canonical page when I look back much later. Mar 7, 2011 at 19:20
  • @RandomBen yeah that's why I've done it, it's just easier than writing an exclusion rule as well
    – Tom Gullen
    Mar 7, 2011 at 20:32
  • I wouldn't call it redundant at all. This is exactly the point of a canonical tag - to tell search engines the preferred URL of a page. If the current URL is the preferred URL then you need to specify that as well. Aug 22, 2012 at 9:38
0

Update to this question: Google says it is OK to point the canonical tag to itself. Bing recommends against it.

2
  • 2
    Can you link to the sources you used that explains why Bing recommends against it?
    – John Conde
    Oct 10, 2011 at 17:21
  • This post summarizes it all!
    – BenMorel
    Nov 26, 2014 at 12:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.