I have set up my server with SPF and DKIM and activated DMARC with
v=DMARC1; pct=100; ruf=mailto:[email protected]; rua=mailto:[email protected]; p=reject
So far everything works perfectly, I get reports for ± all emails send via the server (not everyony seems to have implemened DMARC
reports) and reports for emails failing the SPF/DKIM
checks.
As far as I understand DMARC
does many things:
- Tells servers what do do with emails failing
SPF/DKIM
checks (reject them in my case) - Tells servers do send reports for email received (
rua
) - Tells servers do send reports for email received which failed
SPF/DKIM
checks (ruf
)
The documentation on dmarc.org seems to imply that I should only activate rejected reports if I'm willing to possibly get spammed. In my experience the normal reports fir successful mails seem to be a lot more spammy, and less helpfull, and the few
My question is: Do I need the rua
and ruf
parts of DMARC
at all, once I confirmed that all legitimat emails are propperly received, and I don't experience problems with falsly spammed emails?
Is my DMARC
entry still valid, and will it be propperly applied, if it simply says:
v=DMARC1; pct=100; p=reject