Timeline for Does Google filter out some reviews in their Google+ rating average?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Aug 27, 2016 at 12:04 | vote | accept | Sarke | ||
| Aug 27, 2016 at 11:50 | answer | added | Simon Hayter | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 27, 2016 at 9:16 | comment | added | Sarke | Not schema, it's all on Google. Google users reviewing a Google Places place. | |
| Aug 27, 2016 at 9:12 | comment | added | Simon Hayter | Is this organic results e.g Schema Review Markup? Or Google Local search results? | |
| Aug 27, 2016 at 7:45 | history | edited | Sarke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 712 characters in body
|
| Aug 27, 2016 at 7:26 | comment | added | Sarke | Ok, whatever. It's Google Places, but whatever. Yes, it shows on the search page. So? Numbers still don't add up. | |
| Aug 27, 2016 at 6:07 | comment | added | closetnoc | It is related to search. The knowledge graph feeds search and shows on the right of the search results. Plus, I am not talking about search. I am talking about the knowledge graph. | |
| Aug 27, 2016 at 5:14 | comment | added | Sarke | I'm talking about Google Places. This info is show in both the knowledge graph and on Google Maps. This is not related to search. | |
| Aug 27, 2016 at 5:01 | comment | added | closetnoc | Are you talking about the knowledge graph card on the right of the search results? If not, then you may want to clarify where specifically you are the discrepancy. That will help. I assumed you were talking about the knowledge graph card. It is still possible the discrepancy is related. | |
| Aug 27, 2016 at 4:45 | comment | added | Sarke | Also, this doesn't concern the search at all. | |
| Aug 27, 2016 at 4:43 | comment | added | Sarke | @closetnoc but it still doesn't add up. The most recent reviews are 4, 5, and 5. In order to average to the 3.9 rating, you have to keep those and remove three of the 1-star ratings. So this is not a stale-data issue. And I never said anything about programmers... | |
| Aug 27, 2016 at 4:21 | comment | added | closetnoc | Please don't think that programmers are working so hard as to have Google look at the reviews and make decisions. Seriously. Google is compromised of several parts. Search is just one. The knowledge graph is another. If you are seeing a knowledge graph card on the right, then your instinct regarding updating is correct. No search engine is real-time or even close. The knowledge graph and search are busy places. It is extremely likely that the knowledge graph has not updated the entry for the business yet. This may be a periodic batch style process. Who knows? | |
| Aug 27, 2016 at 4:19 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 27, 2016 at 5:09 | |||||
| Aug 27, 2016 at 4:15 | history | asked | Sarke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |