Timeline for What's the benefit in using Schema.org markup as Google already knows all the information
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2016 at 7:32 | vote | accept | vegemite4me | ||
| Jun 22, 2016 at 22:08 | comment | added | closetnoc | @Rob I gotcha! And I appreciate it. Cheers!! | |
| Jun 22, 2016 at 20:49 | comment | added | Rob | My point was that markup gives a better understanding of the content when it's not obvious. | |
| Jun 22, 2016 at 17:26 | history | edited | closetnoc | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Tried to clarify things.
|
| Jun 22, 2016 at 17:16 | comment | added | closetnoc | @Rob Your example underestimates Googles ability to understand content somewhat. Google has had the ability to understand content extremely well without mark-up, however, I do take your point and updated my answer to reflect what you are trying to say. Cheers!! | |
| Jun 22, 2016 at 17:13 | history | edited | closetnoc | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Tried to clarify things.
|
| Jun 22, 2016 at 12:55 | comment | added | Rob | Example: <span>President</span> This carries no identifying information about what that word is for. Schema markup can identify that as a title for a company officer. | |
| Jun 21, 2016 at 19:51 | history | answered | closetnoc | CC BY-SA 3.0 |