Timeline for How to customize a site in search engine results?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:37 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| May 19, 2016 at 10:42 | history | bounty ended | WildDev | ||
| May 18, 2016 at 18:30 | vote | accept | WildDev | ||
| May 18, 2016 at 16:10 | comment | added | closetnoc | @dhaupin In fact, until this morning, I could not have given you an example of Google pulling from DMOZ now or ever. This would have made me conclude that it likely does not pull from DMOZ - at least not any more. This is why I agree! Cheers!! | |
| May 18, 2016 at 16:03 | comment | added | closetnoc | @dhaupin Until this morning, I would have agreed. It seems that Google still does silly 5h17 like take DMOZ seriously. That is soooooo 2008! It goes back to my explanation of legacy code and how old code does not disappear. I keep this in mind as I give my SEO advice. I look at what is new, old, and how technology works. Part of this is what legacy code may still exist. For example, Google still favors lots of cr@ppy links to rank sites. Even if they come from one site! Sheeeessshh! Just when you think they are getting their act together, you see old junk ranking hacks still being effective. | |
| May 18, 2016 at 15:57 | comment | added | dhaupin | Nice answer man. I didn't know G "officially" looks around to grab snips like that. Strange....they look down on link directories, yet they use an ancient/outdated/dupy/entitlement/bias/club/goodolboys link directory to build a crucial SE description that can be found modernized from various other places. | |
| May 18, 2016 at 13:32 | history | edited | closetnoc | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Tiny edit.
|
| May 18, 2016 at 13:26 | history | answered | closetnoc | CC BY-SA 3.0 |