Timeline for Manual "Fetch as Google" or better wait?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2014 at 0:57 | comment | added | closetnoc | @KasperSouren Thanks for the heads up!! I isolated the problem and disabled it. It was a just in case condition (one of two) that was failing. After dinner I will look at the code again to see what is going wrong. It is a bit of backwards logic and maybe I went cross-eyed and backwards at the same time. I could not get the browser to hit my site from inside the network last night or you would not have seen this. My site is a bit of an experiment as I write some patents for things that I will share with the community when done. Sorry for the inconvenience! Thanks again!! | |
| Oct 15, 2014 at 23:45 | comment | added | closetnoc | @KasperSouren Yeah sorry for that. I noticed that it was doing that to me yesterday and I am in the white-list. I will be hitting this hard over the next few days. Previously, the site was all but dead and only existed to collect some data. Now I am trying to take some of the processes and data and make something of it. But it is my night-time hobby as I have a business to run during the day. I have debug code in to find out what exactly is failing. The code otherwise is straight forward enough and not rocket science, but something that was reliable is no longer and needs a rework. | |
| Oct 15, 2014 at 23:36 | comment | added | the | @closetnoc, off-topic: your site is telling me I'm "blacklisted or found to be an unwanted or abusive spider." Got some work to do there as I don't think I'm either of these. Not sure how else to inform you about this as it's also saying "Do not contact us if you see this page." | |
| Oct 15, 2014 at 22:54 | comment | added | closetnoc | @KasperSouren I respect what you are saying. Thank You for the comment. One of the things I like is when people keep me honest. As part of the research group I am in, some operational, schema, and business rule details were shared with us and I evaluated these documents for the processes that we were concerned with such as developing trust networks, self-defending networks, and so on. In return, we shared developments back to Google. | |
| Oct 15, 2014 at 22:47 | comment | added | closetnoc | @KasperSouren Not everything I know I read off of the Internet. Some of it comes from Google directly. Some of it comes with working on niche search engines. And some of it comes from experience. If there are references I can make them to back up my statements and often do. Google took some servers that were used in the Google fetch queue to build the Fetch as Google feature but did not update them to match googlebot as they aged. There was little difference between them anyway. Even then, the update in May may have only been to the website with no mention of the bot being updated. Who knows? | |
| Oct 15, 2014 at 19:51 | comment | added | the | It'd be great if you can add some links to sources for these statements. | |
| Oct 15, 2014 at 15:51 | history | edited | closetnoc | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
It looks like the fetch as google tool was updated though the details are slight.
|
| Oct 15, 2014 at 15:37 | comment | added | closetnoc | @Max The Fetch as Google was updated in May with the Fetch and Render feature. Prior to that, it was simply a functional version of Googlebot that lived outside of the normal queuing process and was not updated for the simple reason- it was a tool. The differences were extremely slight at that point. Updating the answer. | |
| Oct 15, 2014 at 11:08 | comment | added | Max | Is there some documentation about the fetch as Google being an outdated version of Google bot, and that a page wont perform the same after doing a fetch as Google, as it would if simply found by Google? | |
| Oct 14, 2014 at 22:31 | history | answered | closetnoc | CC BY-SA 3.0 |