Timeline for SEO & Reordering of duplicate content
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2014 at 14:56 | answer | added | Jérôme Verstrynge | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 4, 2014 at 15:04 | answer | added | closetnoc | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 4, 2014 at 14:35 | comment | added | Stephen Ostermiller♦ | I'm not sure that I understand how this works. I do understand that the menus on your site will vary their order based on the context of the current page. I'm not sure why the menus themselves have URLs. In my experience menus are parts of large pages and don't get their own URLs. | |
| Jul 4, 2014 at 9:34 | comment | added | Malibur | @closetnoc : Yes I am interested in that too, but my question is more precisely: "does reordering of the same content still count as duplicate." | |
| Jul 4, 2014 at 9:31 | comment | added | Malibur | @guisasso: its the same content, but reordered. And they all have different "main" content. Does this still apply to canonical urls? I have the impression that canonical is more for the exact same pages with different urls, such as dynamic ´?itemid=32´ which could have a pretty variant as well ´/awesome-product´? thats not exactly the case in my example | |
| Jul 3, 2014 at 15:57 | comment | added | closetnoc | I guess the question is, what is the ratio of new content per page verses duplicate content? | |
| Jul 3, 2014 at 15:35 | comment | added | riseagainst | It's the same content that you arrive to by different ways which is exactly what you use canonical for. | |
| S Jul 3, 2014 at 12:20 | history | suggested | Sathiya Kumar V M | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Formatting, Removed 40 characters in body, added a tag
|
| Jul 3, 2014 at 12:18 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 3, 2014 at 12:20 | |||||
| Jul 3, 2014 at 10:26 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 3, 2014 at 11:05 | |||||
| Jul 3, 2014 at 10:07 | history | asked | Malibur | CC BY-SA 3.0 |