Timeline for For pages with one painting and no text except the painting name, media used and size, what should the meta description language be written like?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2014 at 12:23 | comment | added | dasickle | Thanks for your feedback. I should have been clearer. I edited my answer a bit. | |
| May 23, 2014 at 12:23 | history | edited | dasickle | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 245 characters in body
|
| May 23, 2014 at 2:29 | comment | added | closetnoc | I gotcha. When I read this, it seemed to be indicating that there is an SEO effect other than (CRT/UX). | |
| May 23, 2014 at 2:18 | comment | added | dasickle | However,providing better UX and achieving greater CRT will lead to better search indirectly by many other contributing factors. Social, referral traffic and better link profile just to name a few. | |
| May 23, 2014 at 2:13 | comment | added | dasickle | If you read my statement carefully you will notice that I didn't not say that is helps with search directly. Google does not include meta description in its algorithm. | |
| May 23, 2014 at 0:10 | comment | added | closetnoc | The problem is that the description meta-tag does not help with search. Any keywords in the description do not rank. They have CTR value only. | |
| May 22, 2014 at 19:08 | history | edited | Stephen Ostermiller♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
list formatting, remove "hope it helps"
|
| May 22, 2014 at 19:07 | history | edited | dasickle | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected spelling
|
| May 22, 2014 at 18:49 | history | answered | dasickle | CC BY-SA 3.0 |