Timeline for New META TAGS with positive effects for seo ranking in 2011 and beyond
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
38 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2013 at 18:13 | history | edited | Stephen Ostermiller♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spelling corrections
|
| Mar 24, 2011 at 0:51 | history | edited | Sam | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 82 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Mar 6, 2011 at 6:51 | answer | added | user5878 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 23, 2010 at 10:51 | answer | added | Indian T.v Serials | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 13, 2010 at 17:11 | vote | accept | Sam | ||
| Dec 9, 2010 at 0:17 | comment | added | Sam |
Guys, Guys, for a minute i really dont care if this is a valid quesion, an invalid community wiki, or whatever: IS ACCORDING TO U MODERN PRO WEBMASTER THE META TAG CANONICAL ADVISED TO BE USED FOR WEBSITES IN 2011 OR IS IT ALREADY HISTORY? (added above for us all) different viewpoints please to not let one author accidentally think his/her suggestion is a fact, which never is unless purely boring mathematical questions are asked ( which is in daily life very rare ).
|
|
| Dec 9, 2010 at 0:14 | vote | accept | Sam | ||
| Dec 9, 2010 at 0:14 | |||||
| Dec 9, 2010 at 0:14 | history | edited | Sam | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 35 characters in body
|
| Dec 7, 2010 at 23:51 | vote | accept | Sam | ||
| Dec 9, 2010 at 0:14 | |||||
| Dec 6, 2010 at 19:36 | history | edited | Sam | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 21 characters in body
|
| Dec 6, 2010 at 19:16 | comment | added | John Conde♦ | Basically they're looking more for a discussion on meta tags then factual information. A good sign a question needs to be community wiki is when the question is updated with information from the answers as a collection of knowledge. | |
| Dec 6, 2010 at 19:00 | comment | added | Marco Demaio | @John Conde: no right answer?! Not sure what you mean. The right answer is: "there are NO new meta tags with positive effects for seo ranking in 2011 and beyond" beside the ones that have always had positive effects like META DESCRIPTION. That is the answer I gave. | |
| Dec 6, 2010 at 3:49 | history | edited | Sam | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 12 characters in body
|
| Dec 5, 2010 at 21:37 | comment | added | John Conde♦ | I didn't make it community wiki but since there is no one right answer it was the right call. | |
| Dec 3, 2010 at 17:26 | history | edited | Sam | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 68 characters in body
|
| Dec 3, 2010 at 9:18 | history | edited | Sam | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 33 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2010 at 22:12 | comment | added | Marco Demaio | Why was this now made community wiki?! Whatever! | |
| Dec 2, 2010 at 20:57 | history | edited | Sam | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 4 characters in body; Post Made Community Wiki
|
| Dec 2, 2010 at 18:39 | history | edited | Sam | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 73 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2010 at 18:03 | comment | added | Marco Demaio | @John Conde: you should get +100 for those two EXCELLENT links. Thanks for sharing! | |
| Dec 2, 2010 at 17:46 | history | edited | Sam | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 3 characters in body; added 12 characters in body; added 6 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2010 at 17:38 | history | edited | Sam | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 211 characters in body; deleted 4 characters in body; added 4 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2010 at 17:33 | history | edited | Sam | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 17 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2010 at 17:27 | history | edited | Sam | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 9 characters in body; added 75 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2010 at 17:19 | history | edited | Sam | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 175 characters in body; added 24 characters in body; deleted 81 characters in body; added 16 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2010 at 17:11 | history | edited | Sam | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 9 characters in body; added 153 characters in body; deleted 12 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2010 at 17:06 | history | edited | Sam | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 78 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2010 at 15:08 | comment | added | John Conde♦ | And microformats are preferred for breadcrumbs, especially for SEO. | |
| Dec 2, 2010 at 14:48 | comment | added | Stephan Muller |
Also, the 'breadcrumbs' already exist in the form of rel='next' and rel='previous' among others. WordPress uses these, but imho they're not really useful at all.
|
|
| Dec 2, 2010 at 14:16 | comment | added | John Conde♦ | On a similar topic, for anyone who missed it, Google has a new meta tag for Google news that allows the author to get credit when their work is republished. | |
| Dec 2, 2010 at 14:04 | comment | added | John Conde♦ | Wikipedia already did this. And inventing your own meta tag is useless unless you have your own crawler that honors it. Otherwise everyone else is going to ignore it. Also, none of the meta tags you listed affect rankings. In fact, no meta tags affect ranking. | |
| Dec 2, 2010 at 14:00 | answer | added | Stephan Muller | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 2, 2010 at 13:43 | history | edited | Sam | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 88 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2010 at 13:37 | history | edited | Sam | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2010 at 13:36 | answer | added | Davis Peixoto | timeline score: -1 | |
| Dec 2, 2010 at 13:35 | answer | added | Vergil Penkov | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 2, 2010 at 13:35 | answer | added | Marco Demaio | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 2, 2010 at 13:23 | history | asked | Sam | CC BY-SA 2.5 |