Timeline for What is the best file extension for an SEO friendly URL?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2013 at 8:34 | history | edited | Zistoloen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Formatting
|
| Nov 30, 2010 at 9:29 | comment | added | Lèse majesté | Technically, the URL matters. It's just that pointless "optimizations" like the ones in question don't matter. It matters if you have a clean and descriptive URL. It doesn't matter whether or not you put an extension at the end of a URL. It'd be stupid if that made any sort of a difference. And it's a waste of time searching for these micro-optimizations that add no value for users. Why not focus on the optimizations that actually improve your site and are good for both users and search engines? | |
| Nov 30, 2010 at 8:42 | comment | added | Starx |
@Shakti, I did answer your question in the first sentence URL, they matter a lot less, you can go with any choice
|
|
| Nov 30, 2010 at 8:34 | comment | added | Aajahid | Well, I know that. URl and h1 title is going to be same, But here I have 3 choice. High ranked websites uses extension. Now my question is which one will be better choice? | |
| Nov 30, 2010 at 7:56 | history | answered | Starx | CC BY-SA 2.5 |