Timeline for Blog Layout, duplicate content and SEO
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2014 at 8:31 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/458161060928061440 | ||
| Apr 18, 2014 at 8:51 | vote | accept | web-tiki | ||
| Apr 15, 2014 at 16:41 | comment | added | web-tiki | @LiamSorsby I had never thought of it that way, but you got a point. | |
| Apr 15, 2014 at 15:51 | answer | added | closetnoc | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 15, 2014 at 15:50 | comment | added | Liam Sorsby | @web-tiki duplicate means the entire content of the page is exactly the same as another page. Is the entire content of the page exactly the same? Otherwise it's like saying i have a header footer and sidebars all throughout my site, it is duplicate content | |
| Apr 15, 2014 at 15:20 | comment | added | web-tiki |
@Martijn I Though of using noindex on the archive layout witch displays content from other pages so the older entries would still have values
|
|
| Apr 15, 2014 at 15:18 | comment | added | web-tiki |
@LiamSorsby it is duplicate because the content displayed in archives is already displayed on other pages
|
|
| Apr 15, 2014 at 14:38 | comment | added | Liam Sorsby | @web-tiki if it's not a duplicate then there wouldn't be any need to use canonical link tags so you would be fine for this. | |
| Apr 15, 2014 at 14:37 | comment | added | Martijn | Don't use noindex! Don't you want seo value for older entries? | |
| Apr 15, 2014 at 14:31 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 15, 2014 at 14:32 | |||||
| Apr 15, 2014 at 14:27 | comment | added | web-tiki |
@LiamSorsby I can use canonical link on the archives/article page but not on the archives page as it is not a copy of an other page , it just features articles from several other pages.
|
|
| Apr 15, 2014 at 14:18 | comment | added | Liam Sorsby | on the other hand, if you implemented canonical links you wouldn't need to use noindex as canonical indicates it is a duplicate (that is if the link doesn't point to itself) | |
| Apr 15, 2014 at 14:13 | comment | added | Liam Sorsby | possible duplicate of Does Rel=Canonical Pass PR from Links or Just Fix Dup Content | |
| Apr 15, 2014 at 13:49 | history | asked | web-tiki | CC BY-SA 3.0 |