Timeline for How can I create SEO friendly URLs for an ecommerce website?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Aug 2, 2018 at 19:30 | history | suggested | Patrick Mevzek | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
RFC2606 compliance, formatting
|
| Aug 2, 2018 at 19:06 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Aug 2, 2018 at 19:30 | |||||
| Mar 13, 2014 at 7:48 | comment | added | Abhinav | Ok then which one should I use product-name-uniqueid or product-name/uniqueid . Does it make much difference? | |
| Mar 12, 2014 at 10:32 | comment | added | ExploWare | sorry, the + is not right, in url breakdown its translated as a space. a dash(.) is better, or even a dot (.) You could consider another ending as well. A .php, .html or / would be nice (for [backward]compatibility with other clients) | |
| Mar 12, 2014 at 10:00 | comment | added | Abhinav | Ya that right. I was asking about should I separate unique-id with + or / | |
| Mar 12, 2014 at 9:58 | comment | added | ExploWare | the permanent linking is a big advantage if people are talking about a product. As your site is behaving right now it has its unique ID in its url, the Product id, 1023 in your example. Its most-likely buildup in the order of CatID+ProdID, so always unique and re-traceable to a specific product | |
| Mar 12, 2014 at 9:54 | comment | added | Abhinav | Why productname+unique-id? I have seen this in another major ecommerce website. Shouldn't it be productname/unique-id as a random number being appended with name google might not give it that much weightage isn't it? | |
| Mar 12, 2014 at 9:46 | history | answered | ExploWare | CC BY-SA 3.0 |