Timeline for Any reason not to buy SSL certificates from a reseller?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2015 at 22:10 | vote | accept | webmain | ||
| May 30, 2015 at 22:10 | answer | added | webmain | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 4, 2014 at 10:39 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/440798755110273024 | ||
| Mar 3, 2014 at 22:01 | comment | added | webmain | @w3d if you're talking to me, that is at least what the reseller is claiming. I went ahead and bought it and the verification procedure seemed to go exactly the same as when I had bought the certificate directly in the past. | |
| Mar 3, 2014 at 22:01 | comment | added | webmain | @dan Thanks, that's the main thing I was looking for. | |
| Mar 3, 2014 at 21:58 | comment | added | MrWhite | Are you suggesting that the $49 and $10.95 certificates are the same? | |
| Mar 3, 2014 at 21:17 | comment | added | dan♦ | If the reseller offers the same SSL certificate as the certificate authority, there's no difference to users - it will display the CA in the certificate information. | |
| Mar 3, 2014 at 18:47 | answer | added | closetnoc | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 3, 2014 at 18:46 | answer | added | Kevan Sheridan | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 3, 2014 at 18:23 | history | asked | webmain | CC BY-SA 3.0 |