Timeline for Can I redirect Google bot to another domain with escaped_fragments?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2014 at 11:01 | comment | added | Stephen Ostermiller♦ |
_escaped_fragment URLs are one case in which Google allows you to do something different for search engine crawlers as long as the content is the as for users.
|
|
| Feb 6, 2014 at 9:40 | comment | added | zigojacko | No. Google et al only care about what is visibly rendered to the end user (or at least, most importantly). If the structure of this differs for humans or search crawler User Agents then this won't matter a great deal (providing markup is appropriate/valid of course). | |
| Feb 6, 2014 at 9:37 | comment | added | Giann | Does the DOM structure needs to be the same ? | |
| Feb 6, 2014 at 9:35 | comment | added | zigojacko | As long as the visible content is essentially the same, then this won't cause an issue no. Any effects or styling with CSS or JQuery won't matter. | |
| Feb 6, 2014 at 9:31 | comment | added | Giann | Does providing crawlers with a "simplified version" of the ajax equivalent pages is enough ? I was thinking of providing pages with marked up content only (no css or js). | |
| Feb 6, 2014 at 9:26 | comment | added | zigojacko | This is true and also valid. The OP may also find this useful on the subject. | |
| Feb 6, 2014 at 9:13 | comment | added | Liam Sorsby | good point, however if this is for escaped_fragments it may not hurt as the content served by this is to do with supplying google with html snapshots of the ajax pages that will be loaded to make "crawlable ajax" so aslong as the content is the same as the ajax that would have been served i'm not sure this would be a massive issue | |
| Feb 6, 2014 at 8:36 | history | answered | zigojacko | CC BY-SA 3.0 |