Timeline for Does changing phone numbers in content just for bots qualify as cloaking?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2013 at 19:28 | answer | added | Stephen Ostermiller♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 9, 2013 at 23:22 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/410187612755091456 | ||
| Dec 7, 2013 at 17:49 | history | edited | Frank | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body; edited title
|
| Dec 7, 2013 at 15:22 | comment | added | Stephen Ostermiller♦ | Yes, I agree that this innocuous and white hat, but I have always read Google's statements on cloaking as a zero tolerance policy with little room to argue intent or actual effect on users. | |
| Dec 7, 2013 at 15:02 | answer | added | AgA | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 7, 2013 at 13:35 | comment | added | John Conde♦ | It's just a phone number and it only affects tracking. Intent is the key. Seeing a different phone number doesn't affect the quality of the content. | |
| Dec 7, 2013 at 11:32 | comment | added | Stephen Ostermiller♦ | @JohnConde Do you have a reference for that statement? I recommend avoiding all server side cloaking. | |
| Dec 7, 2013 at 1:52 | history | edited | dan♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Edited for better understanding - correct if wrong.
|
| Dec 6, 2013 at 21:42 | comment | added | John Conde♦ | That wouldn't be an issue at all | |
| Dec 6, 2013 at 21:41 | history | edited | John Conde♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 9 characters in body
|
| Dec 6, 2013 at 21:41 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 6, 2013 at 21:41 | |||||
| Dec 6, 2013 at 21:22 | history | asked | Frank | CC BY-SA 3.0 |