Skip to main content
Clarifications.
Source Link
dan
  • 15.2k
  • 11
  • 45
  • 52

Although the URL's forboth the IP address and domain bothmight lead to the same content onat any given datemoment, the content for each was likely indexed on different dates. Note the differences in the snippet for the IP address, which starts with "5 days ago", versus the snippet for the domain.

It looks like much of the content there is dynamic and changes frequently, as other news-based sites tend to bedo. Hence they're not the same web pages as of the date they're indexed on, and both are valid URL's. Although - although the domain name resolves back to the IP address, Google can index IP addresses too.

Although the URL's for the IP address and domain both lead to the same content on any given date, the content for each was likely indexed on different dates. Note the differences in the snippet for the IP address, which starts with "5 days ago", versus the snippet for the domain.

It looks like much of the content there is dynamic and changes frequently, as other news-based sites tend to be. Hence they're not the same web pages as of the date they're indexed on, and both are valid URL's. Although the domain name resolves back to the IP address, Google can index IP addresses too.

Although both the IP address and domain might lead to the same content at any given moment, the content for each was likely indexed on different dates. Note the differences in the snippet for the IP address, which starts with "5 days ago", versus the snippet for the domain.

It looks like much of the content there is dynamic and changes frequently, as other news-based sites do. Hence they're not the same web pages as of the date they're indexed on, and both are valid URL's - although the domain name resolves back to the IP address, Google can index IP addresses too.

Further clarification after editing question.
Source Link
dan
  • 15.2k
  • 11
  • 45
  • 52

Although the URL's for the IP address and domain both lead to the same content todayon any given date, the content for each was likely indexed on differentdifferent dates. Note the differences in the snippet for the IP address, which starts with "5 days ago", versus the snippet for the domain.

It looks like much of the content there is dynamic and changes frequently, as other news-based sites tend to be. Hence they're not the same web pages as of the date they're indexed on, and both are valid URL's (the. Although the domain name resolves back to the IP address), Google can index IP addresses too.

Although the URL's for the IP address and domain both lead to the same content today, the content for each was likely indexed on different dates. Note the differences in the snippet for the IP address, which starts with "5 days ago", versus the snippet for the domain.

It looks like much of the content there is dynamic and changes frequently, as other news-based sites tend to be. Hence they're not the same web pages as of the date they're indexed on, and both are valid URL's (the domain name resolves back to the IP address).

Although the URL's for the IP address and domain both lead to the same content on any given date, the content for each was likely indexed on different dates. Note the differences in the snippet for the IP address, which starts with "5 days ago", versus the snippet for the domain.

It looks like much of the content there is dynamic and changes frequently, as other news-based sites tend to be. Hence they're not the same web pages as of the date they're indexed on, and both are valid URL's. Although the domain name resolves back to the IP address, Google can index IP addresses too.

Added further clarification.
Source Link
dan
  • 15.2k
  • 11
  • 45
  • 52

Although the URL's for the IP address and domain both lead to the same content today, the content for each was likely indexed on different dates. Note the differences in the snippet for the IP address, which starts with "5 days ago", versus the snippet for the domain.

It looks like much of the content there is dynamic and changes frequently, as other news-based sites tend to be. Hence they're not the same web pages as of the date they're indexed on, and both are valid URL's (the domain name resolves back to the IP address).

Although the URL's for the IP and domain both lead to the same content today, the content for each was likely indexed on different dates. Note the differences in the snippet for the IP, which starts with "5 days ago", versus the snippet for the domain.

It looks like much of the content there is dynamic and changes frequently, as other news-based sites tend to be. Hence they're not the same web pages as of the date they're indexed on.

Although the URL's for the IP address and domain both lead to the same content today, the content for each was likely indexed on different dates. Note the differences in the snippet for the IP address, which starts with "5 days ago", versus the snippet for the domain.

It looks like much of the content there is dynamic and changes frequently, as other news-based sites tend to be. Hence they're not the same web pages as of the date they're indexed on, and both are valid URL's (the domain name resolves back to the IP address).

Clarification.
Source Link
dan
  • 15.2k
  • 11
  • 45
  • 52
Loading
Source Link
dan
  • 15.2k
  • 11
  • 45
  • 52
Loading