Timeline for Are keywords in URLs good SEO or needlessly redundant?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2015 at 7:27 | history | protected | dan♦ | ||
| Dec 18, 2014 at 18:11 | history | edited | Stephen Ostermiller♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 16, 2013 at 14:09 | history | edited | Zistoloen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Formating.
|
| Oct 18, 2013 at 8:04 | comment | added | user2434 | Having keyword in URL is great when you have quality links to your site otherwise it does not worth having a keyword in URL. | |
| Apr 16, 2013 at 11:54 | vote | accept | Blazemonger | ||
| Apr 15, 2013 at 20:34 | comment | added | Blazemonger | I did find this page which ranks the relative importance of different parts of the page, but it doesn't provide a source for its numbers, so I'm taking them with a grain of salt. | |
| Apr 15, 2013 at 19:44 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/323884510511001600 | ||
| Apr 15, 2013 at 18:25 | comment | added | Simon Hayter | If the customer is only targeting local businesses and people then you want to look up local rankings factors, since its very different. | |
| Apr 15, 2013 at 18:13 | history | edited | Blazemonger | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 53 characters in body
|
| Apr 15, 2013 at 16:41 | answer | added | Michel | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 15, 2013 at 15:39 | answer | added | Stephen Ostermiller♦ | timeline score: 28 | |
| Apr 15, 2013 at 14:39 | answer | added | Simon Hayter | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 15, 2013 at 14:26 | history | edited | Blazemonger | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 53 characters in body
|
| Apr 15, 2013 at 14:19 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 15, 2013 at 14:32 | |||||
| Apr 15, 2013 at 14:18 | answer | added | Itai | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 15, 2013 at 14:02 | history | asked | Blazemonger | CC BY-SA 3.0 |