Timeline for What Google will do while switching from 301/404 to 200?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2013 at 13:39 | history | edited | user12370 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 44 characters in body
|
| S Feb 2, 2013 at 14:08 | history | suggested | stealthyninja | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed grammar.
|
| Feb 2, 2013 at 13:37 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 2, 2013 at 14:08 | |||||
| Feb 2, 2013 at 11:30 | comment | added | Stephen Ostermiller♦ | I use 302 temporary redirects for page numbers that are too high. This is precisely because they could come back. 404 is a fine status as well, but don't use 410 (gone). | |
| Feb 2, 2013 at 9:45 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Feb 2, 2013 at 9:25 | answer | added | Free Radical | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 2, 2013 at 7:56 | comment | added | user12370 | I discovered some fake sites linking (I think) intentionally to nonexistent pages... probably these sites are made by competitors for seo-attacking my customer's site, increasing the number of page errors... | |
| Feb 2, 2013 at 7:31 | comment | added | JCL1178 | Why would a third party site link to a page that doesn't exist? I'm a little unclear on what you are asking here... | |
| Feb 2, 2013 at 5:14 | history | asked | user12370 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |