Timeline for Web pages with mixed ownership photos
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2012 at 16:33 | comment | added | dstonek | These are John Mueller's (from Google) words: "...it's fine to have both a link rel=publisher and author-markup on the same page. The rel=publisher confirms that your website is the publisher of that Google+ Page; the authorship markup confirms that you (your personal profile) is the author of the content on that page. This markup can be used independently, since the meanings are slightly different. " So I don't need to remove publisher id. I guess handling vcards for each photographer and a link to a page containing his images would be enough. I'll post this 'solution' | |
| Jul 28, 2012 at 22:25 | comment | added | Anthony Hatzopoulos |
Also I think publisher is very different then the author indicator, support.google.com/webmasters/bin/… like <a href="[profile_url]?rel=author">Google</a> or <a href="https://plus.google.com/109412257237874861202? rel=author">Google</a>
|
|
| Jul 28, 2012 at 22:19 | comment | added | Anthony Hatzopoulos |
Then do not <link href="https://plus.google.com/nnnnnnnnnn/" rel="publisher" /> on the pages containing photos authored by other people. Only use it on content you write or create.
|
|
| Jul 28, 2012 at 22:09 | comment | added | dstonek | This would be a problem, the images wouldn't be indexed. I don't want this. I know that images duplicated in other sites may reduce their ranking, but at least this is better than remove them from index. | |
| Jul 28, 2012 at 3:14 | history | answered | Anthony Hatzopoulos | CC BY-SA 3.0 |