3 replaced example non-working link with a good old <pre>
source | link

At MozCon last year there were a few presenters who indicated that the shorter the URL the better. You see a lot of retailers using http://example.com/product_idhttp://example.com/product_id these days. Evidence has shown that keyword stuffing your URL ex. http://example.com/mens/shoes/opentoed/for/midgets/that/like/boxing/stupid_long_product_namehttp://example.com/mens/shoes/opentoed/for/midgets/that/like/boxing/stupid_long_product_name offers no advantage.

Along the same lines, it seems that having a semantic urlURL is important but the article or product name might not be necessary. I need to find some references for this.

As an observation some retailers and magazine use a unique number in the urlURL and title to avoid duplicate title issues. Not sure if this actually works or not.

At MozCon last year there were a few presenters who indicated that the shorter the URL the better. You see a lot of retailers using http://example.com/product_id these days. Evidence has shown that keyword stuffing your URL ex. http://example.com/mens/shoes/opentoed/for/midgets/that/like/boxing/stupid_long_product_name offers no advantage.

Along the same lines, it seems that having a semantic url is important but the article or product name might not be necessary. I need to find some references for this.

As an observation some retailers and magazine use a unique number in the url and title to avoid duplicate title issues. Not sure if this actually works or not.

At MozCon last year there were a few presenters who indicated that the shorter the URL the better. You see a lot of retailers using http://example.com/product_id these days. Evidence has shown that keyword stuffing your URL ex. http://example.com/mens/shoes/opentoed/for/midgets/that/like/boxing/stupid_long_product_name offers no advantage.

Along the same lines, it seems that having a semantic URL is important but the article or product name might not be necessary. I need to find some references for this.

As an observation some retailers and magazine use a unique number in the URL and title to avoid duplicate title issues. Not sure if this actually works or not.

2 use standardized example domains as per RFC 2606
source | link

At MozCon last year there were a few presenters who indicated that the shorter the URL the better. You see a lot of retailers using http://retailer.com/product_idhttp://example.com/product_id these days. Evidence has shown that keyword stuffing your URL ex. http://retailer.com/mens/shoes/opentoed/for/midgets/that/like/boxing/stupid_long_product_namehttp://example.com/mens/shoes/opentoed/for/midgets/that/like/boxing/stupid_long_product_name offers no advantage.

Along the same lines, it seems that having a semantic url is important but the article or product name might not be necessary. I need to find some references for this.

As an observation some retailers and magazine use a unique number in the url and title to avoid duplicate title issues. Not sure if this actually works or not.

At MozCon last year there were a few presenters who indicated that the shorter the URL the better. You see a lot of retailers using http://retailer.com/product_id these days. Evidence has shown that keyword stuffing your URL ex. http://retailer.com/mens/shoes/opentoed/for/midgets/that/like/boxing/stupid_long_product_name offers no advantage.

Along the same lines, it seems that having a semantic url is important but the article or product name might not be necessary. I need to find some references for this.

As an observation some retailers and magazine use a unique number in the url and title to avoid duplicate title issues. Not sure if this actually works or not.

At MozCon last year there were a few presenters who indicated that the shorter the URL the better. You see a lot of retailers using http://example.com/product_id these days. Evidence has shown that keyword stuffing your URL ex. http://example.com/mens/shoes/opentoed/for/midgets/that/like/boxing/stupid_long_product_name offers no advantage.

Along the same lines, it seems that having a semantic url is important but the article or product name might not be necessary. I need to find some references for this.

As an observation some retailers and magazine use a unique number in the url and title to avoid duplicate title issues. Not sure if this actually works or not.

1
source | link

At MozCon last year there were a few presenters who indicated that the shorter the URL the better. You see a lot of retailers using http://retailer.com/product_id these days. Evidence has shown that keyword stuffing your URL ex. http://retailer.com/mens/shoes/opentoed/for/midgets/that/like/boxing/stupid_long_product_name offers no advantage.

Along the same lines, it seems that having a semantic url is important but the article or product name might not be necessary. I need to find some references for this.

As an observation some retailers and magazine use a unique number in the url and title to avoid duplicate title issues. Not sure if this actually works or not.