Timeline for Why are YouTube URLs so ugly?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2011 at 11:35 | vote | accept | hungneox | ||
| Dec 4, 2011 at 17:57 | comment | added | DisgruntledGoat | @Toby yes, as it stands now it makes zero difference to Google what the URL is, as they treat those pages specially. I just added a few more points to my answer about that :) | |
| Dec 4, 2011 at 17:54 | history | edited | DisgruntledGoat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
more details
|
| Dec 4, 2011 at 17:44 | history | edited | DisgruntledGoat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Dec 4, 2011 at 11:28 | comment | added | Toby | +1 for "It's a perfect example of how having an awesome site is way more important than worrying over tiny details." It really is proof that content is king, if you have a site that everyone loves because of the content, search engines will make an effort to find it. The fact Google owns them probably doesn't hurt either ;-) | |
| Dec 4, 2011 at 11:00 | history | answered | DisgruntledGoat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |