Timeline for Duplicating someone's content legitimately & writing HTML to support that
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2011 at 21:11 | history | migrated | from stackoverflow.com (revisions) | ||
| Nov 24, 2011 at 22:25 | comment | added | Shomz | Fair enough... rel=author will have to do then. | |
| Nov 24, 2011 at 22:09 | comment | added | Codecraft | It wouldn't help the original author for a site to duplicate their content and then appear in search; Google will apply the duplicate content penalty (probably to both sites) and people might even see my copy above the original works in rankings, and take traffic away from the author. The benefit of my being able to reproduce content is not for my SEO, but for giving visitors more to read when they arrive at my blog. The articles I write will be searchable and will contribute to my SEO. | |
| Nov 24, 2011 at 21:58 | history | answered | Shomz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |