Timeline for Internal links for a website
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:33 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/ with https://webmasters.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Nov 5, 2011 at 13:57 | comment | added | dolphin | Talking only about internal links; Its good to save link juice for pages where you really need them. So isn't it suggestable to put dofollow attribute of internal links only to the ones that point to doindex pages? Yes or no (maximum number of links per page has nothing to do with this)? Of course I need to put keyword to anchor text but in case if I have to (do I have to? this hasn't been answered yet) and if is recommendable to save link juice and have dofollow links to just doindex pages, can I still put anchor text with keyword and use nofollow? I cannot use just "click here and see". | |
Nov 4, 2011 at 15:02 | comment | added | Zhaph - Ben Duguid | @w3d - cheers, indeed, I prefer the NOINDEX option (which is the route I took) for exactly that reason, and the one I gave in my answer - just because you've added a NoFollow, that won't stop someone else linking to it. | |
Nov 4, 2011 at 14:23 | comment | added | MrWhite | @Zhaph: In that case you should just have the noindex (and perhaps nofollow) robots meta tag on the page you don't want indexed (the 'tags' page). I see no benefit in including nofollow on links to that page and that would also be harder to maintain. | |
Nov 4, 2011 at 14:02 | comment | added | Zhaph - Ben Duguid | I'm thinking more a listing of posts tagged with a term - the indexed page would contain 10 posts that are effectively duplicating one or more archive pages of content - there is no-one canonical URL for that page. | |
Nov 4, 2011 at 13:57 | comment | added | John Conde♦ | Duplicate content should be handled with canonical URLs, not nofollow. | |
Nov 4, 2011 at 13:53 | history | answered | Zhaph - Ben Duguid | CC BY-SA 3.0 |