Timeline for Is sitemap really important?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2011 at 23:40 | comment | added | Kzqai | Really, the upshot is that people find things on the internet mainly via search engines now, so SEO is a continuous need. | |
| May 26, 2011 at 23:39 | comment | added | Kzqai | Again, I doubt it, because, for example, facebook doesn't just have one large person running it. Take public pages, and more public space in general, which facebook is moving to. Since those pages will be crawled by search engines, and facebook wants it's users to benefit from high visibility, they have to do SEO on them. Or on publications by facebook, like developer APIs, or privacy changes. Same with twitter, higher visibility for their users is better for the. I think that the important emphasis is that priority should go to usability for users, then search engines, that is the key. | |
| May 26, 2011 at 21:55 | comment | added | Davis Peixoto | @Tchalvak OK, I respect your opinion, despite it is different of mine. I don't want make a long discussion trending to trolls-like, but I ensure those guys don't really worries about SEO. they worry about accessibility, usability, reliability... but not crawlability or the content quality. | |
| May 25, 2011 at 21:28 | comment | added | Kzqai | -1 because absolutely those services worry about SEO. They're not in competition with little guys like us, but they are in competition with each-other. Big doesn't mean that SEO isn't still essential. | |
| May 24, 2011 at 3:54 | history | answered | Davis Peixoto | CC BY-SA 3.0 |