Timeline for SEMRush reports a high html-to-text ratio, what is optimal for SEO?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2021 at 21:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackWebmasters/status/1354897047523102725 | ||
| Jan 27, 2021 at 20:36 | answer | added | gperson1968 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 26, 2021 at 23:41 | answer | added | Maximillian Laumeister♦ | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 26, 2021 at 19:01 | comment | added | Stephen Ostermiller♦ | I edited your question title and tags to indicate this is based on advice from SEMRush | |
| Jan 26, 2021 at 19:00 | history | edited | Stephen Ostermiller♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Add SEMRush to title and tags
|
| Jan 26, 2021 at 18:58 | comment | added | Stephen Ostermiller♦ | Many SEO tools report a variety of metrics that are unlikely to have any actual impact on SEO. SemRush explains why they have this metric at point #6. I'm also suspicious of some of their other metrics. Of the things they test for, I'd only pay attention to broken links and missing title tag. Many of their other tests are either outdated or not something that I would think would make much difference. | |
| Jan 26, 2021 at 18:02 | comment | added | Gaurav Jain | If there is no concept of ration of text to HTML then why SEO tool like SEMRush shows the warning of low text-HTML ratio? | |
| Jan 25, 2021 at 16:28 | comment | added | Stephen Ostermiller♦ | Why would you think that there's an optimal ratio for SEO? The ratio is going to very widely depending on what the page does. If it's a long story it's going to have more text and less HTML. If it's a web-based tool it's going to be mostly HTML and very little text. I don't see how this ratio could possibly matter for SEO beyond trying to minimize your HTML for performance reasons. | |
| Jan 25, 2021 at 16:22 | history | edited | Trebor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Typo in title
|
| Jan 25, 2021 at 13:29 | history | asked | Gaurav Jain | CC BY-SA 4.0 |