Timeline for Can hreflang be placed on the body of the HTML?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2017 at 3:07 | comment | added | Rob | @Boldewyn You have it backwards. It is the W3C who has the WHATWG text word-for-word. (Even so, that is not true either.) It is an unfortunate split from the computer scientists of the W3C for the cool kids of WHATWG. github.com/w3c/charter-html/issues/112 | |
| Dec 26, 2017 at 19:26 | comment | added | Boldewyn | @Rob no one “defected.“ Also if you'd read carefully, you've seen that I posted the link to the WHATWG spec in the first comment. In this specific case, though, they match literally word-by-word (§4.5.2 of WHATWG text, §4.8.2 of W3C text). | |
| Dec 22, 2017 at 17:53 | history | edited | Simon Hayter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 16 characters in body
|
| Dec 22, 2017 at 17:32 | history | edited | Simon Hayter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1796 characters in body
|
| Dec 22, 2017 at 17:27 | comment | added | Simon Hayter | @Rob updated answer | |
| Dec 22, 2017 at 17:27 | history | edited | Simon Hayter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1796 characters in body
|
| Dec 22, 2017 at 17:01 | comment | added | Simon Hayter |
@Rob Google supports <head><link></head>, HTTP Header or Sitemap and at no point does it say it will support BCP 47 tags.
|
|
| Dec 22, 2017 at 14:41 | comment | added | Rob | @Boldewyn Browser vendors have all defected to WHATWG, for HTML at least, unfortunately. Use WHATWG as a reference. | |
| Dec 22, 2017 at 13:56 | comment | added | Boldewyn | And the W3C version: w3.org/TR/html5/textlevel-semantics.html#the-a-element | |
| Dec 22, 2017 at 13:55 | comment | added | Boldewyn |
This is not true. You can place @hreflang equally well on <a> elements. The specification: html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/…
|
|
| Dec 22, 2017 at 13:18 | vote | accept | Adrian Godoy | ||
| Dec 22, 2017 at 13:01 | history | answered | Simon Hayter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |