Timeline for Spammy microdata penalty reconsideration rejected
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2019 at 22:53 | history | edited | dan♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed typo introduced by previous edit.
|
| S Dec 31, 2019 at 22:49 | history | suggested | Muhammad Dyas Yaskur | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
add the determiners
|
| Dec 31, 2019 at 22:06 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 31, 2019 at 22:49 | |||||
| Feb 20, 2017 at 19:13 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackWebmasters/status/833756515467157504 | ||
| Feb 11, 2017 at 19:25 | answer | added | Evgeniy | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 27, 2017 at 11:54 | comment | added | Stephen Ostermiller♦ | It sounds to me like they want review microdata only to be used for specific products. Maybe using it for services (like oven cleaning) isn't allowed. Or maybe they think that the oven cleaning pages is not for a specific company, but allows you to book oven cleaners from many different companies. | |
| Jan 20, 2017 at 16:44 | comment | added | closetnoc | I am clueless then. I do not use mark-up though I will again. I did use reviews back in the days when no-one seemed to care. ;-) Ooopppsss. If I think of anything, then I will chime in again. Cheers!! | |
| Jan 20, 2017 at 12:22 | comment | added | ePetkov | @closetnoc, thanks for looking it up. The reviews in the markup are indeed a day or two behind, so there could be a difference of 5-10 votes between the rating in the content and the one that is marked up. However we are talking about 1200+ reviews, so i don't believe this could be a reason, as +/- 10 votes doesn't change the rating so much with 1200 votes. The reviews in the site are the same as the ones in the original source (trust pilot in this case), as we feed them directly in real time. I talked with TrustPilot, but there is nothing wrong nowhere. | |
| Jan 20, 2017 at 12:15 | history | edited | ePetkov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 534 characters in body
|
| Jan 19, 2017 at 21:03 | comment | added | closetnoc | It might help to see the original notice you recieved. There may be some clues in the notice. Please know that Google uses some algorithms to validate the reviews as being realistic. As well, if the reviews are available elsewhere, Google will compare what it sees between the various sites. I am not saying that is what is happening, however, I thought that information may help. You may want to talk to TrustPilot and see if they can help identify the problem. They may have an idea. Cheers!! | |
| Jan 19, 2017 at 18:46 | history | asked | ePetkov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |