Timeline for Google indexing duplicate content despite a canonical tag pointing to external URL. Am I risking a penalty from Google?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2019 at 17:53 | history | edited | Stephen Ostermiller♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
spelling and tags
|
| Jan 7, 2017 at 11:08 | history | edited | Stephen Ostermiller♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
clarity
|
| Dec 22, 2016 at 3:17 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackWebmasters/status/811772652968939520 | ||
| Dec 20, 2016 at 1:23 | answer | added | MrWhite | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 19, 2016 at 19:08 | comment | added | Hafeez Ullah | I am determining by using site:example.com | |
| Dec 19, 2016 at 17:30 | comment | added | closetnoc | Having only duplicated content is death in Googles eyes. Your site has to offer value of it's own. Keep in mind there are two forms of penalty. One we all know as Panda and Penguin where a site or pages will be de-listed. The other is where the penalty is applied page by page in the SERP (search engine result page) placement. This is how a site lives or dies. It is possible that a search site: directive will return all your pages and your site will suffer poor performance due to a SERP penalty which will certainly happen without original content. Cheers!! | |
| Dec 19, 2016 at 17:13 | comment | added | MrWhite | The canonical tag presumably points to the "other site" where the content originates? Do you have other, unique, content on your site that you do want indexed? | |
| Dec 19, 2016 at 17:11 | history | edited | MrWhite | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Grammar
|
| Dec 19, 2016 at 17:07 | comment | added | MrWhite |
How are you determining that Google has indexed those URLs? Do you see these pages returned in "normal" search results? Or are you using a site: search?
|
|
| Dec 19, 2016 at 16:18 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 19, 2016 at 17:13 | |||||
| Dec 19, 2016 at 16:17 | history | asked | Hafeez Ullah | CC BY-SA 3.0 |