network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 10 months |
| seen | Mar 26 at 11:04 | |
| stats | profile views | 4 |
stackoverflow makes me think of oneflewovercuckoo'snest.
|
Feb 14 |
awarded | Excavator |
|
Feb 14 |
revised |
XMPP Protocol on XAMPP I think it is Perl, isn't it? |
|
Feb 13 |
suggested | suggested edit on XMPP Protocol on XAMPP |
|
Feb 11 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Feb 11 |
accepted | More preview lines in Google search results |
|
Feb 11 |
asked | More preview lines in Google search results |
|
Aug 31 |
revised |
SVG in CSS backgrounds added 696 characters in body; edited title |
|
Aug 31 |
comment |
SVG in CSS backgrounds This sounds like there is no way around javascript since to parse the User-Agent string alone there needs to be some logic ? The image is opaque but the fallback solution is not optimal since the edges of the image in the raster picture are blurry and "shine" like an eclipse from behind the svg which is definitely not what I want. So in essence, I need to create two versions of the web page ? one real and one fallback ? |
|
Aug 31 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Aug 31 |
comment |
SVG in CSS backgrounds I don't know - maybe a placeholder with a link saying "you can't display svg images for some reason, do you want to load the raster images or install the svg viewer plugin?" It is kind of a pain since noone wants to invest any time for displaying the style of a website correctly if it doesn't convey any information - so I'm a bit helpless here - should I just add a footer "this site is best displayed with xyz browser" ? |
|
Aug 31 |
revised |
SVG in CSS backgrounds more info |
|
Aug 31 |
awarded | Student |
|
Aug 31 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Aug 31 |
revised |
SVG in CSS backgrounds typo |
|
Aug 31 |
asked | SVG in CSS backgrounds |
