meta user
network profile
| bio | website | eed3si9n.com |
|---|---|---|
| location | New Jersey | |
| age | 33 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 11 months |
| seen | Jun 26 '11 at 19:52 | |
| stats | profile views | 1 |
Active software developer on and off the work. Interested in software architecture, API design, web services, and security. Author of scalaxb, an XML databinding tool for Scala.
|
Jun 26 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Jun 25 |
comment |
Should plus be encoded in mailto: hyperlinks? In RFC 3986, mailto would be treated as path-rootless, which allows sequence of pchar defined by (unreserved / pct-encoded / sub-delims / ":" / "@"). + is part of sub-delims. So strict reading says + does not require percent encoding. |
|
Jun 25 |
comment |
Should plus be encoded in mailto: hyperlinks? If you have encode + in URI, @ also needs to be encoded because it's also a reserved character. If you read the RFC carefully, you will find out that in a opaque part, + is legal. |
|
Jun 25 |
comment |
Should plus be encoded in mailto: hyperlinks? When a part does not start with /, + no longer becomes a reserved character. |
|
Jun 25 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
Jun 25 |
answered | Should plus be encoded in mailto: hyperlinks? |
|
Jun 25 |
awarded | Autobiographer |
