| bio | website | ellipsix.net |
|---|---|---|
| location | State College, PA | |
| age | 27 | |
| visits | member for | 2 years, 10 months |
| seen | Oct 10 '12 at 15:48 | |
| stats | profile views | 22 |
I'm a fifth year graduate student in physics at Penn State University, doing research in high-energy particle phenomenology. I also have a hobby interest in computer programming.
|
Oct 18 |
comment |
Alternative to .htaccess (due to bad performance?) While I agree with most of this, I would not say that "For simple rewriting tasks on a low- to normal-traffic web site, .htaccess is still the way to go." If you have write access to the central Apache configuration, there is no advantage to using .htaccess files. Sure, the disadvantage may be negligible, but that's not a reason to do it. |
|
Sep 16 |
awarded | Organizer |
|
Sep 14 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Sep 14 |
revised |
Apache2: Deny access for mail.mydomain.com but allow www.mydomain.com, both points same ip improve formatting and edit tags (not sure I picked the right ones though) |
|
Sep 14 |
suggested | suggested edit on Apache2: Deny access for mail.mydomain.com but allow www.mydomain.com, both points same ip |
|
Sep 14 |
comment |
Apache2: Deny access for mail.mydomain.com but allow www.mydomain.com, both points same ip Although technically this works, it's inefficient for a couple reasons: first, mod_rewrite is pretty complex so it's best to avoid using it when you can do without it; also, enabling .htaccess files at all adds several filesystem accesses to every request. Besides, it's just weird organization to put a domain-level redirect in a directory context. |
|
Sep 14 |
answered | Apache2: Deny access for mail.mydomain.com but allow www.mydomain.com, both points same ip |
|
Jul 18 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Jun 6 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
Dec 11 |
awarded | Quorum |
|
Dec 9 |
awarded | Precognitive |
|
Jul 29 |
comment |
How can I stop a bot attack on my site? With the [F] in the rewrite rule, I would think it should be sending a 403 code, not 404... |
|
Jul 28 |
comment |
Should I use mixed content on my blog? In my experience a webmaster would be responsible for the maintenance of the technical aspects of the site, i.e. making sure that there is a usable, capable, up-to-date blogging platform available, and keeping it available. When there are enough people involved to keep the webmastering and authoring roles separate, the actual content that goes on the site does not come from the webmaster him/herself. But in practice, it's often the same person wearing both hats, so to speak - especially on a personal website. |
|
Jul 26 |
comment |
Is there a free, open-source question and answer (Q&A) application similar to StackExchange? Relevant link (and also shameless self-promotion which I swear is merely a side effect): webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1541/… |
|
Jul 26 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Jul 26 |
comment |
How long did it take for your new website to be indexed by search engines 3 weeks sounds unusually long... I don't have any concrete data on hand but I'm pretty sure Google (for instance) picks up on changes to my sites much quicker than that. |
|
Jul 25 |
comment |
Combine websites without hurting SEO Just adding that server-side redirects can (and generally should) be done in the main server configuration rather than .htaccess files. |
|
Jul 24 |
comment |
Book on moving from dedicated apps to web apps? Definitely a good fit for Stack Overflow. |
|
Jul 24 |
answered | How to Install OSQA Q and A application in Apache |
|
Jul 23 |
comment |
DNS sub-domain registration Yeah, but I don't think that really counts as "registration." |