meta user
network profile
| bio | website | caspershouse.com |
|---|---|---|
| location | Brooklyn, NY | |
| age | 38 | |
| visits | member for | 2 years, 3 months |
| seen | Apr 29 at 14:29 | |
| stats | profile views | 23 |
|
Apr 29 |
accepted | Is SEO affected negatively by having densely encoded identifiers of content in URLs? |
|
Jul 24 |
awarded | Caucus |
|
Apr 8 |
comment |
Is SEO affected negatively by having densely encoded identifiers of content in URLs? @MikeHudson I don't disagree; being a developer though, you know how we are, we obsess sometimes over the completely wrong thing. A wake-up call such as this is always appreciated (and informative). However, your comment indicates that it might have a positive effect, or maybe I'm misinterpreting. You said only if all other aspects are perfectly optimized. Does that indicate that this might have an effect? |
|
Apr 7 |
asked | Is SEO affected negatively by having densely encoded identifiers of content in URLs? |
|
Apr 7 |
awarded | Citizen Patrol |
|
Feb 10 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Jan 18 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Jan 18 |
accepted | Is the implementation of a temporary “blackout” like Wikipedia's considered black/white/grey hat SEO? |
|
Jan 18 |
awarded | Student |
|
Jan 18 |
comment |
Is the implementation of a temporary “blackout” like Wikipedia's considered black/white/grey hat SEO? Interesting, as I didn't take into account the idea that Google was a party to everything. I think it's safe to say that in this incident, it's OK, as Google agrees with the actions, but as a general practice, if Google isn't in agreement, don't do it (as with most things involving SEO). Would you agree? |
|
Jan 18 |
asked | Is the implementation of a temporary “blackout” like Wikipedia's considered black/white/grey hat SEO? |
|
Dec 23 |
awarded | Autobiographer |
|
Aug 15 |
awarded | Excavator |
|
Jun 2 |
answered | Tracking Facebook “Likes” |
|
May 31 |
revised |
How to use rel='canonical' properly Improved formatting |
|
May 31 |
suggested | suggested edit on How to use rel='canonical' properly |
|
May 29 |
revised |
Old pages still appearing in Google? Removed "thanks" as per SO philosophy |
|
May 29 |
suggested | suggested edit on Old pages still appearing in Google? |
|
May 28 |
revised |
Tips on hosting a non-web framework based application on a Windows host (i.e. - not IIS, Apache, etc.)? Removed "thank you" and signature as per general StackExchange philosophy. |
|
May 28 |
suggested | suggested edit on Tips on hosting a non-web framework based application on a Windows host (i.e. - not IIS, Apache, etc.)? |
