meta user
network profile
| bio | website | getfinn.com |
|---|---|---|
| location | Montevideo, Uruguay | |
| age | 25 | |
| visits | member for | 2 years, 7 months |
| seen | 4 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 18 |
from future import braces SyntaxError: not a chance (, line 1)
|
Nov 23 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
May 21 |
comment |
Remembering CSS Left, Top, Right, Bottom +1 for feeding us with CRAP! |
|
Apr 27 |
comment |
Ad serving applications - alternative to Openx? That looks like quite a big problem... |
|
Mar 16 |
comment |
Will HTML5 adoption render my site search engine unoptimized? This is for webmasters.stackexchange.com |
|
Feb 3 |
comment |
What is a CMS with good user forums support? In my experience, Joomla! is a no no! |
|
Jan 24 |
answered | What is the best way to promote a programming blog? |
|
Dec 12 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Dec 12 |
comment |
How big sites scale up and optimize to massive traffic? Just in case it HipHop doesn't turn PHP into C++, it connects the two languages in a way that Facebook logic behind the site is done in C++ (which is much faster and CPU usage friendly) but the "inputs to that logic" is done by PHP. |
|
Dec 10 |
answered | If I have a page rank of 5, and I get alot of backlinks from sites with PR 1, will I then decrease in PR? |
|
Dec 7 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Dec 7 |
comment |
What's better for SEO folders or filenames? Thank you very much! That clarifies a lot really! |
|
Dec 7 |
accepted | What's better for SEO folders or filenames? |
|
Dec 6 |
comment |
What's better for SEO folders or filenames? @Farseeker, thanks! but its not the same thing though, right? |
|
Dec 6 |
comment |
What's better for SEO folders or filenames? @Litso any documentation pointing to that? I agree to you it will not be crucial now a days! |
|
Dec 6 |
asked | What's better for SEO folders or filenames? |
|
Dec 2 |
comment |
Google has a bad SEO? That is some excellent material sir! I'll take a good look. |
|
Dec 1 |
awarded | Student |
|
Dec 1 |
comment |
Google has a bad SEO? Yes, I agree they dont need/want rank there I just thought it would be natural, I'll agree with "The reason is purely because Google does not have the word "engine" anywhere on the page." |
|
Dec 1 |
comment |
Google has a bad SEO? +1 for humor, thanks for the answer. |
|
Nov 30 |
comment |
Google has a bad SEO? It is not a matter of needing to appear first, of course they don´t need! But should´t their system detect that google might be an relevant query for someone searching "search engine"? I'm sure they did not address this case in particular, so the generality, google should rank good. I just find it strange. |
