meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 6 months |
| seen | 2 days ago | |
| stats | profile views | 15 |
|
Dec 7 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Dec 7 |
accepted | SEO - Index images (lazyload) |
|
Dec 6 |
comment |
SEO - Index images (lazyload) I was reading something, use anchors (<a href>), affects the division of page-rank for links? |
|
Dec 6 |
comment |
SEO - Index images (lazyload)noscript been shown to benefit the user side. I tested it with Google actually indexes after running javascript, but I'm still doing testing with other search engines. Unfortunately I have not had anything conclusive. Thanks. you were one of the most rational people who gave me an answer, I wish you much success. |
|
Dec 6 |
comment |
SEO - Index images (lazyload)Suggestion # 1:
Search engines may end up indexing the contents of src (ie. )?
Suggestion # 3:
If search engines index this way, then the best thing would be to use <noscript><img src="image"></noscript> if javascript is enabled the DOM-Javascript takes the contents of noscript and transforms it: <img src="image">, agree? Thanks (+1 for you) |
|
Dec 6 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Dec 6 |
comment |
SEO - Index images (lazyload) Thanks, but... As I said on html5: Because html5 is not supported by any browser (especially mobile). And the attribute data-src="image.jpg" not work at all Indexers. And I add, I need something that is independent of html5 (ie validate in HTML4 as well), since this plugin will be distributed to other developers. And I repeat, my doubts about indexing of images is not about javascript. I'm sorry, but I will speak: read the entire question before answering. Sincerely Guilherme. |
|
Dec 3 |
revised |
images within noscript deleted 5 characters in body |
|
Dec 3 |
revised |
images within noscript added 753 characters in body |
|
Dec 2 |
comment |
images within noscript I prefer to create from scratch. Moreover as I was told on several sites have different programming languages, besides pure html. I really want a HTML structure to index images. thanks. |
|
Dec 2 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Dec 2 |
comment |
images within noscript I have several websites, made with php, html, asp-classic, .net (c#). I do not use CMS, I develop from scratch. |
|
Dec 1 |
comment |
images within noscript The problem is that maintaining the Sitemap, HTML pages would have to have maintenance manual. Not the best practice at the time. |
|
Dec 1 |
revised |
images within noscript added 22 characters in body |
|
Dec 1 |
comment |
images within noscript The SRC attribute empty is bad. I need something that does not disturb the indexing of images. My question is about indexing images in search engines. It's like I said: My question is not about javascript. Edit your answer please. Thanks. |
|
Nov 30 |
revised |
images within noscript orthographic correction |
|
Nov 30 |
revised |
images within noscript added 1441 characters in body |
|
Nov 29 |
revised |
images within noscript fixed english |
|
Nov 28 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Nov 28 |
revised |
images within noscript added 11 characters in body |
