meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 9 months |
| seen | May 15 at 15:24 | |
| stats | profile views | 17 |
|
May 11 |
comment |
SEO and HTML semantics of putting H2 above H1 elements? @bybe: With "obsolete" I refered to hgroup. As we can’t use hgroup for heading+tagline anymore, we need to use alternatives for this construct. But using two headings without hgroup is not a suitable (correct/useful/…) alternative, exactly because of the reason why hgroup was introduced in the first place: the "tagline" shouldn’t be a heading on its own, as it "messes" up the document outline. |
|
May 10 |
comment |
SEO and HTML semantics of putting H2 above H1 elements? Side note: You shouldn’t use a h2 for the tagline (with hgroup it would be okay, but this element is obsoleted now), as it creates another entry in the outline. Instead, your tagline should probably go into a p. Otherwise all following content (including sectioning elements) would be in scope of the tagline. |
|
May 7 |
awarded | Caucus |
|
May 5 |
answered | Googlebot is blocked from my domain |
|
Apr 21 |
revised |
Good idea if I only have <header> and <footer> inside <article>? code markup |
|
Apr 21 |
suggested | suggested edit on Good idea if I only have <header> and <footer> inside <article>? |
|
Apr 9 |
answered | Question about duplicate groups (agents) in robots.txt |
|
Mar 30 |
revised |
Using Schema for Blogging Article VS BlogPosting itemprop="keywords" specified on every keyword |
|
Mar 30 |
comment |
Using Schema for Blogging Article VS BlogPosting @bybe: Regarding schema.org keywords: Great, I updated the code. |
|
Mar 30 |
comment |
Using Schema for Blogging Article VS BlogPosting @bybe: Regarding the title attribute: Yes, the tooltip is missing then. But the point is: the tooltip is not needed here, as the same content is already present in the link anchor. The content of the title attribute doesn't give any new information here. For example, for some screenreader users the same content would be read twice. |
|
Mar 29 |
answered | Using Schema for Blogging Article VS BlogPosting |
|
Mar 27 |
comment |
Extremely similar SEO keywords I don't think so. The spec neither. foo bar can be something different than foo, bar. |
|
Mar 25 |
comment |
we choose to use tables to layout web forms: (how) can we make them valid/accessible? Why would you explicitly define tabindex here? The form elements are focusable by default, and you didn't change the tab order. |
|
Mar 25 |
comment |
we choose to use tables to layout web forms: (how) can we make them valid/accessible?abbr is still allowed in HTML5. acronym was removed; you should use abbr now for it, too. |
|
Mar 21 |
comment |
Robots.txt on one line No, a record is a whole block: "The record starts with one or more User-agent lines, followed by one or more Disallow lines […]". A line starts with a field, a record consists of lines. |
|
Mar 19 |
comment |
Robots.txt on one line Yeah, that is the spec I linked to. It says: "The file consists of one or more records separated by one or more blank lines. Each record contains lines of the form […]" — and there blank lines are not listed as allowed line inside of a record. |
|
Mar 18 |
comment |
Robots.txt on one line Where did you find that empty lines are allowed inside of a record? AFAIR they are only allowed to separate records. |
|
Mar 17 |
revised |
Do other search engines support Google's “hash bang” syntax for crawling AJAX applications? linked the doc, code markup, paragraphs |
|
Mar 17 |
suggested | suggested edit on Do other search engines support Google's “hash bang” syntax for crawling AJAX applications? |
|
Mar 16 |
comment |
Should I depaginate my webpages? What is the best usability? "which causes your Google rankings to fall": it would be caused by the long loading time itself, but not by the user's visit duration, right? (anyway, Google would know this visit duration only for sites that host Google scripts like Analytics) |
